[PATCH v1 01/16] ufs: core: Probe for ext_iid support
Bart Van Assche
bvanassche at acm.org
Fri Sep 30 11:23:13 PDT 2022
On 9/22/22 18:05, Asutosh Das wrote:
> + hba->mcq_capabilities = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_MCQCAP);
What value is reported when reading the REG_MCQCAP register on an UFSHCI
3.0 controller? -1 or 0?
> + hba->ext_iid_sup = (hba->mcq_capabilities & MASK_EXT_IID_SUPPORT) >>
> + EXT_IID_CAP_SHIFT;
[ ... ]
> + if (dev_info->wspecversion < 0x400)
> + goto out;
Isn't this version check superfluous? Only UFSHCI 4.0 controllers should
support the extended IID feature.
> + ext_ufs_feature = get_unaligned_be32(desc_buf + DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP);
The above change introduces a third instance of this code. Please
introduce a helper function that does something like the following and
replace the above line with a call to that helper function:
if (hba->desc_size[QUERY_DESC_IDN_DEVICE] <
DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP + 4)
return 0;
return get_unaligned_be32(desc_buf +
DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_EXT_UFS_FEATURE_SUP);
> +out:
> + dev_info->b_ext_iid_en = !!ext_iid_en;
Please remove "!!". This conversion happens implicitly when assigning to
a boolean variable.
Thanks,
Bart.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list