[PATCH V5 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to i.MX8QXP M4
Peng Fan
peng.fan at oss.nxp.com
Thu Sep 29 16:16:59 PDT 2022
On 9/29/2022 10:58 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 21:52, Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support attaching to
>>> i.MX8QXP M4
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 06:01:45PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>>
>>>> On 9/28/2022 3:39 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/28/2022 1:56 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:48:02AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for reviewing this patchset.
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
>>>>>>>> attaching to i.MX8QXP M4
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 09:10:20AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When M4 is kicked by SCFW, M4 runs in its own hardware
>>>>>>>>> partition, Linux could only do IPC with M4, it could not
>>>>>>>>> start, stop, update image.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We disable recovery reboot when M4 is managed by SCFW,
>>>>>>>>> because remoteproc core still not support M4 auto-recovery
>>>>>>>>> without loading image.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 108
>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index
>>>>>>>>> 7cc4fd207e2d..bcba74e90020
>>>>>>>>> 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/err.h>
>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/mailbox_client.h> @@ -59,6 +60,8 @@
>>>>>>>>> #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STARTED 0x01
>>>>>>>>> #define IMX_SIP_RPROC_STOP 0x02
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +#define IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED 5
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>> * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure
>>>>>>>>> * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region @@
>>>>>>>>> -89,6
>>>>>>>>> +92,10 @@ struct imx_rproc {
>>>>>>>>> struct work_struct rproc_work;
>>>>>>>>> struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
>>>>>>>>> void __iomem *rsc_table;
>>>>>>>>> + struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc_handle;
>>>>>>>>> + struct notifier_block rproc_nb;
>>>>>>>>> + u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */
>>>>>>>>> + u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] =
>>>>>>>>> { @@ -117,6
>>>>>>>>> +124,18 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att
>>>>>>>>> +imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
>>>>>>>>> { 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 }, };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp[] =
>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>> + { 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
>>>>>>>>> + /* TCML/U */
>>>>>>>>> + { 0x1FFE0000, 0x34FE0000, 0x00040000, ATT_OWN |
>>>>>>>>> +ATT_IOMEM },
>>>>>>>>> + /* OCRAM(Low 96KB) */
>>>>>>>>> + { 0x21000000, 0x00100000, 0x00018000, 0 },
>>>>>>>>> + /* OCRAM */
>>>>>>>>> + { 0x21100000, 0x00100000, 0x00040000, 0 },
>>>>>>>>> + /* DDR (Data) */
>>>>>>>>> + { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x60000000, 0 }, };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] =
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> /* dev addr , sys addr , size , flags */
>>>>>>>>> /* ITCM */
>>>>>>>>> @@ -255,6 +274,12 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg
>>>>>>>> imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq = {
>>>>>>>>> .method = IMX_RPROC_MMIO,
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp =
>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>> + .att = imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp,
>>>>>>>>> + .att_size = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp),
>>>>>>>>> + .method = IMX_RPROC_SCU_API, };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp =
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> .att = imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp,
>>>>>>>>> .att_size = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx8ulp),
>>>>>>>>> @@ -680,6 +705,37 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct
>>>>>>>>> rproc
>>>>>>>> *rproc)
>>>>>>>>> mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc) {
>>>>>>>>> + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>>>>>>>>> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
>>>>>>>>> + return;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + if (!imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
>>>>>>>>> priv->rsrc_id))
>>>>>>>>> + return;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED,
>>>>>>>> BIT(priv->rproc_pt), false);
>>>>>>>>> + imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block
>>>>>>>>> +*nb,
>>>>>>>>> + unsigned long event, void *group) {
>>>>>>>>> + struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct
>>>>>>>>> +imx_rproc, rproc_nb);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + /* Ignore other irqs */
>>>>>>>>> + if (!((event & BIT(priv->rproc_pt)) && (*(u8 *)group ==
>>>>>>>> IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED)))
>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + rproc_report_crash(priv->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + pr_info("Partition%d reset!\n", priv->rproc_pt);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> struct regmap_config config = { .name = "imx-rproc" };
>>>>>>>>> @@ -689,6
>>>>>>>>> +745,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc
>>>>>>>>> +*priv)
>>>>>>>>> struct arm_smccc_res res;
>>>>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>>>> u32 val;
>>>>>>>>> + u8 pt;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> switch (dcfg->method) {
>>>>>>>>> case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
>>>>>>>>> @@ -699,6 +756,51 @@ static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct
>>>>>>>> imx_rproc *priv)
>>>>>>>>> if (res.a0)
>>>>>>>>> priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>>>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>>>> + case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
>>>>>>>>> + ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->ipc_handle);
>>>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
>>>>>>>>> +"fsl,resource-id",
>>>>>>>> &priv->rsrc_id);
>>>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "No fsl,resource-id property\n");
>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>>>> + * If Mcore resource is not owned by Acore
>>>>>>>>> +partition, It is
>>>>>>>> kicked by ROM,
>>>>>>>>> + * and Linux could only do IPC with Mcore and nothing else.
>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>> + if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
>>>>>>>>> +priv-
>>>>>>>>> rsrc_id))
>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned() return '1' than the remote
>>>>>>>> processor is under Linux's control and what follows below is
>>>>>>>> not needed.
>>>>>>>> That is also
>>>>>>>> coherent with the comment in [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Case 1: If M4 is owned by Linux, here directly return 0.
>>>>>>> Case 2: If M4 is not owned by Linux, the following code after
>>>>>>> this line will set state as RPROC_DETACHED.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand that part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch 3/6(this patch) is only to support case 2.
>>>>>>> Patch 4/6 is to support case 1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's leave the subsequent patches alone for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is in contrast with what is happening in
>>>>>>>> imx_rproc_put_scu(). There, if the remote processor is _not_
>>>>>>>> owned by Linux than the condition returns without calling
>>>>>>>> imx_scu_irq_group_enable() and
>>>>>>>> imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(). That seems to be a bug.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. The two functions only needed when M4 is in a separate
>>>>>>> hardware partition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The scu irq is only needed when M4 is out of linux control and
>>>>>>> need some notification such as M4 is reset by SCU(System Control
>>> Unit).
>>>>>>> That linux got
>>>>>>> notification that M4 is reset by SCU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also understand that part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I am underlining here is that when the M4 is independent,
>>>>>> function
>>>>>> imx_scu_irq_register_notifier() and imx_scu_irq_group_enable() are
>>>>>> called but their cleanup equivalent are not called in
>>>>>> imx_rproc_put_scu() because of the '!'
>>>>>> in the if() statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> you are right, this is bug in my side. It should be as below based
>>>>> on patch 3/6.
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>>>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index bcba74e90020..a56aecae00c6
>>>>> 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>>>>> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc
>>>>> *rproc)
>>>>> if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API)
>>>>> return;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (!imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
>>>>> priv->rsrc_id))
>>>>> + if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle,
>>>>> +priv->rsrc_id))
>>>
>>> Indeed, which raises questions about how this patchset was tested. And it
>>> is not the first time we touch base on that.
>>
>> Patch 4/6 has this change, anyway I should not mix patch 3,4 here.
>>
>>>
>>>>> return;
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for detailed reviewing.
>>>>
>>>> If you are fine with this change, I could send out V6. Anyway, I'll
>>>> wait to see if you have other comments in this patchset.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am out of time for this patchset and as such will not provide more
>>> comments on this revision.
>>
>> Sure. Thanks for your time. Since you have applied the attach recovery
>> part, next version will enable this feature in imx rproc.
>>
>
> I would rather not. Please introduce support for the recovery in
> another patchset, once this one has been merged.
I pushed the button too early, sorry. V6 was out yesterday, but the new
patch 7/7 is an incremetenl patch to enable attach recovery.
You could ignore patch 7/7 in V6, I will reply their to note. patch
[1-6]/7 is to achieve same as V5 patchset.
If you need to send V7 which just drop patch 7/7 in V6, please let me know.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Peng.
>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Peng.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Peng.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is also a problem in patch 4/6 associated to that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If the upper explanation eliminate your concern, "a problem in
>>>>>>> patch 4/6" should not be a problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When M4 is owned by Linux, Linux need handle the power domain.
>>>>>>> If M4 is not owned
>>>>>>> by Linux, SCU firmware will handle the power domain, and Linux
>>>>>>> has no permission to touch that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Peng
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2
>>>>>>>> F%2Felixir
>>>>>>>> .bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.0-
>>>>>>>>
>>> rc7%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Ffirmware%2Fimx%2Frm.c%23L24&data=
>>>>>>>> 0
>>>>>>>>
>>> 5%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cbe679e9a409a48b834b908daa015d92
>>>>>>>>
>>> c%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637998312946913
>>>>>>>>
>>> 710%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
>>>>>>>>
>>> MzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=
>>>>>>>>
>>> JDRvoDGGgEiSmbhj3410V2DNxamZbDmMS0U2GvBnI74%3D&reserved
>>>>>>>> =0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>>>>>>>>> + priv->rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + /* Get partition id and enable irq in SCFW */
>>>>>>>>> + ret =
>>>>>>>>> +imx_sc_rm_get_resource_owner(priv->ipc_handle,
>>>>>>>> priv->rsrc_id, &pt);
>>>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "not able to get resource
>>>>>>>>> +owner\n");
>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + priv->rproc_pt = pt;
>>>>>>>>> + priv->rproc_nb.notifier_call =
>>>>>>>>> +imx_rproc_partition_notify;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + ret =
>>>>>>>>> +imx_scu_irq_register_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
>>>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "register scu notifier
>>>>>>>>> +failed.\n");
>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + ret =
>>>>>>>> imx_scu_irq_group_enable(IMX_SC_IRQ_GROUP_REBOOTED,
>>> BIT(priv-
>>>>>>>>> rproc_pt),
>>>>>>>>> + true);
>>>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +imx_scu_irq_unregister_notifier(&priv->rproc_nb);
>>>>>>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Enable irq failed.\n");
>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>> default:
>>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> @@ -803,7 +905,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
>>>>>>>>> platform_device
>>>>>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ret = imx_rproc_clk_enable(priv);
>>>>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>>>>> - goto err_put_mbox;
>>>>>>>>> + goto err_put_scu;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_rproc_vq_work);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @@ -820,6 +922,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
>>>>>>>>> platform_device
>>>>>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> err_put_clk:
>>>>>>>>> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
>>>>>>>>> +err_put_scu:
>>>>>>>>> + imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
>>>>>>>>> err_put_mbox:
>>>>>>>>> imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
>>>>>>>>> err_put_wkq:
>>>>>>>>> @@ -837,6 +941,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_remove(struct
>>>>>>>> platform_device
>>>>>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
>>>>>>>>> rproc_del(rproc);
>>>>>>>>> + imx_rproc_put_scu(rproc);
>>>>>>>>> imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
>>>>>>>>> destroy_workqueue(priv->workqueue);
>>>>>>>>> rproc_free(rproc);
>>>>>>>>> @@ -852,6 +957,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>>>>>>>> imx_rproc_of_match[] = {
>>>>>>>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-cm4", .data =
>>>>>>>> &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mq },
>>>>>>>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-cm7", .data =
>>>>>>>> &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
>>>>>>>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-cm7", .data =
>>>>>>>> &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8mn },
>>>>>>>>> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-cm4", .data =
>>>>>>>> &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8qxp },
>>>>>>>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33", .data =
>>>>>>>> &imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp },
>>>>>>>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-cm33", .data =
>>>>>>>>> &imx_rproc_cfg_imx93 },
>>>>>>>>> {},
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> 2.37.1
>>>>>>>>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list