[RESEND PATCH v2] firmware/psci: Add debugfs support to ease debugging

Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Mon Sep 26 05:04:00 PDT 2022


On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 14:39, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 13:08, Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > To ease debugging of PSCI supported features, add debugfs file called
> > 'psci' describing PSCI and SMC CC versions, enabled features and
> > options.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > I sketched this while trying to narrow down the particular issue on
> > the Qualcomm platform (which started as an attempt to implement PSCI
> > domains, but then led to understanding that while the platform claims
> > supports OSI, it doesn't support SET_SUSPEND). We were going to use
> > this to help to narrow down issues with the PSCI support on other
> > platforms as well.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Extended the table to include MEM_PROTECT functions (noted by Mark
> >   Brown)
> > - Switched to seq_puts where possible
> > - Changed S_IRUGO to 0444
> >
> > The patch is resent to include soc at kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/uapi/linux/psci.h    |  14 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > index cfb448eabdaa..9fdcb6bff403 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> >  #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> >  #include <linux/errno.h>
> >  #include <linux/linkage.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > @@ -324,12 +325,125 @@ static void psci_sys_poweroff(void)
> >         invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF, 0, 0, 0);
> >  }
> >
> > -static int __init psci_features(u32 psci_func_id)
> > +static int psci_features(u32 psci_func_id)
> >  {
> >         return invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_1_0_FN_PSCI_FEATURES,
> >                               psci_func_id, 0, 0);
> >  }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > +
> > +#define PSCI_ID(ver, _name) \
> > +       { .fn = PSCI_##ver##_FN_##_name, .name = #_name, }
> > +#define PSCI_ID_NATIVE(ver, _name) \
> > +       { .fn = PSCI_FN_NATIVE(ver, _name), .name = #_name, }
> > +
> > +/* A table of all optional functions */
> > +static const struct {
> > +       u32 fn;
> > +       const char *name;
> > +} psci_fn_ids[] = {
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(0_2, MIGRATE),
> > +       PSCI_ID(0_2, MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(0_2, MIGRATE_INFO_UP_CPU),
> > +       PSCI_ID(1_0, CPU_FREEZE),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_0, CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_0, NODE_HW_STATE),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_0, SYSTEM_SUSPEND),
> > +       PSCI_ID(1_0, SET_SUSPEND_MODE),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_0, STAT_RESIDENCY),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_0, STAT_COUNT),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_1, SYSTEM_RESET2),
> > +       PSCI_ID(1_1, MEM_PROTECT),
> > +       PSCI_ID_NATIVE(1_1, MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int psci_debugfs_read(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> > +{
> > +       int feature, type, i;
> > +       u32 ver;
> > +
> > +       ver = psci_ops.get_version();
>
> This call and some other calls below, triggers calls into the PSCI FW
> (via smc calls). Rather than having to do that, each time user space
> wants to read the debugfs data, we could cache/store that data during
> the "probe" sequence of the psci fw driver. In this way, we don't need
> to run the smc calls each time, but just once when probing.
>
> Did you consider that option? Or perhaps there are other problems of doing that?

Basically I did not want to complicate this. While caching firmware
information sounds appealing, it would complicate adding support for
the additional debugging features, like checking sleep state stats.

So, I'd say, it's not worth doing that.

>
> > +       seq_printf(s, "PSCIv%d.%d\n",
> > +                  PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR(ver),
> > +                  PSCI_VERSION_MINOR(ver));
> > +
> > +       /* PSCI_FEATURES is available only starting from 1.0 */
> > +       if (PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR(ver) < 1)
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       feature = psci_features(ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID);
> > +       if (feature != PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> > +               ver = invoke_psci_fn(ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID, 0, 0, 0);
> > +               seq_printf(s, "SMC Calling Convention v%d.%d\n",
> > +                          PSCI_VERSION_MAJOR(ver),
> > +                          PSCI_VERSION_MINOR(ver));
> > +       } else {
> > +               seq_puts(s, "SMC Calling Convention v1.0 is assumed\n");
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       feature = psci_features(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(0_2, CPU_SUSPEND));
> > +       if (feature < 0) {
> > +               seq_printf(s, "PSCI_FEATURES(CPU_SUSPEND) error (%d)\n", feature);
> > +       } else {
> > +               seq_printf(s, "OSI is %ssupported\n",
> > +                          (feature & BIT(0)) ? "" : "not ");
> > +               seq_printf(s, "%s StateID format is used\n",
> > +                          (feature & BIT(1)) ? "Extended" : "Original");
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       type = psci_ops.migrate_info_type();
> > +       if (type == PSCI_0_2_TOS_UP_MIGRATE ||
> > +           type == PSCI_0_2_TOS_UP_NO_MIGRATE) {
> > +               unsigned long cpuid;
> > +
> > +               seq_printf(s, "Trusted OS %smigrate capable\n",
> > +                          type == PSCI_0_2_TOS_UP_NO_MIGRATE ? "not " : "");
> > +               cpuid = psci_migrate_info_up_cpu();
> > +               seq_printf(s, "Trusted OS resident on physical CPU 0x%lx (#%d)\n",
> > +                          cpuid, resident_cpu);
> > +       } else if (type == PSCI_0_2_TOS_MP) {
> > +               seq_puts(s, "Trusted OS migration not required\n");
> > +       } else {
> > +               if (type != PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> > +                       seq_printf(s, "MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE returned unknown type (%d)\n", type);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(psci_fn_ids); i++) {
> > +               feature = psci_features(psci_fn_ids[i].fn);
> > +               if (feature == PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (feature < 0)
> > +                       seq_printf(s, "PSCI_FEATURES(%s) error (%d)\n",
> > +                                  psci_fn_ids[i].name, feature);
> > +               else
> > +                       seq_printf(s, "%s is supported\n", psci_fn_ids[i].name);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list