[PATCH] arm64: arch_timer: Fix the lack of set_next_event* for workaround of Cortex-A73 erratum 858921
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Tue Sep 13 07:12:36 PDT 2022
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:47:23 +0100,
Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> The patch a38b71b0833e moves the programming of the timers from
> the countdown timer (TVAL) over to the comparator (CVAL). This
> makes it necessary to read the counter when setting next event.
> However, the workaround of Cortex-A73 erratum 858921 does not
> set the corresponding set_next_event_phys and set_next_event_virt.
> This patch fixes it.
>
> Fixes: a38b71b0833e ("clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Move system register timer programming over to CVAL")
> Signed-off-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 9ab8221ee3c6..ff935efb6a88 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -473,6 +473,8 @@ static const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround ool_workarounds[] = {
> .desc = "ARM erratum 858921",
> .read_cntpct_el0 = arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0,
> .read_cntvct_el0 = arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0,
> + .set_next_event_phys = erratum_set_next_event_phys,
> + .set_next_event_virt = erratum_set_next_event_virt,
> },
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUN50I_ERRATUM_UNKNOWN1
With the fixed commit message as suggested by Oliver, and a subject
more conform to the style of previous commits (something like:
"clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Fix handling of ARM erratum 85821"):
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
Daniel, I assume you'll pick this?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list