[PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: arm64: permit all VM_MTE_ALLOWED mappings with MTE enabled

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Mon Sep 12 09:23:16 PDT 2022


On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 20:30:32 +0100,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc at google.com> wrote:
> 
> Certain VMMs such as crosvm have features (e.g. sandboxing) that depend
> on being able to map guest memory as MAP_SHARED. The current restriction
> on sharing MAP_SHARED pages with the guest is preventing the use of
> those features with MTE. Now that the races between tasks concurrently
> clearing tags on the same page have been fixed, remove this restriction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc at google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index d54be80e31dd..fc65dc20655d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1075,14 +1075,6 @@ static void sanitise_mte_tags(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
>  
>  static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
> -	/*
> -	 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> -	 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> -	 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> -	 */
> -	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> -		return false;
> -
>  	return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
>  }
>  

Can you provide a pointer to some VMM making use of this functionality
and enabling MTE? A set of crosvm patches (for example) would be
useful to evaluate this series.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list