[PATCH v1 1/1] iio: adc: mxs-lradc-adc: Get rid of OF specifics
Jonathan Cameron
jic23 at kernel.org
Sun Sep 11 02:52:15 PDT 2022
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:36:20 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 18:10:06 +0100
> > Jonathan Cameron <jic23 at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 May 2022 20:33:24 +0300
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > First of all, the additional conversion from vIRQ, and this is exactly
> > > > what is returned by platform_get_irq_byname(), to vIRQ is not needed.
> > > Confusing sentence form. Perhaps:
> > >
> > > First, the additional conversion from vIRQ (returned by platform_get_irq_byname())
> > > to vIRQ is not needed.
> > >
> > > > Hence, drop no-op call to irq_of_parse_and_map().
> > > >
> > > > Second, assign the firmware node instead of of_node.
>
> ...
>
> > > Seems sensible to me, but I'd like a sanity check from someone more
> > > familiar with this driver.
> >
> > This one has been outstanding for a few weeks. I'd still like
> > an Ack or similar form someone who knows this device well.
> >
> > If no one has looked at it in a week or so I'll just go with
> > my judgement and pick it up.
>
> Any news on this one? Maybe I need to resend with the better commit message?
>
From glancing back at the thread, looks like you said you were going to send
a v2 with property.h include. I think the rest of the thread is concerned
with a different issue entirely.
Jonathan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list