[GIT PULL] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting

[Conor.Dooley at microchip.com]

On 07/09/2022 17:41, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 04:39:31PM +0000, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>> On 15/08/2022 23:14, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Hey Will/Palmer/Sudeep,
>>>
>>> Catalin suggested [0] dropping the CC: stable for the arm64 patch and
>>> instead making it a specific prereq of the RISC-V patch & making a PR,
>>> so here we are.. I was still up when -rc1 came out so pushed it last
>>> night to get the test coverage, but LKP seems to not have reported a
>>> build success since early on the 13th so not holding my horses! I built
>>> it again for both ARMs and RISC-V myself.
>>>
>>> I tagged it tonight, so it's on conor/linux.git as riscv-topo-on-6.0-rc1
>>> with the prereq specified.
>>>
>>> Not sure if you want to merge this too Sudeep or if that's up to Greg?
>>
>> What's the story with this from an arm64 & topology PoV?
>> Palmer merged this into riscv/for-next a couple weeks ago, so just
>> wondering what the craic is on the other fronts.
> 
> If it's merged in the riscv tree, then I guess we don't need to do anything
> on the arm64 side. It would be handy if it's on its own branch, however,
> just in case we run into a conflict later on during the cycle.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/log/?h=arch-topo

FWIW it's here as 2 commits on top of v6.0-rc1

> 
> Catalin -- this is the series we spoke about the other day touching the
> topology code.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Will
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv