[PATCH v7 0/6] Support hld delayed init based on Pseudo-NMI for arm64
Lecopzer Chen
lecopzer.chen at mediatek.com
Sat Sep 3 02:45:23 PDT 2022
Hi Will, Mark
Sorry for bothering you, this need to be reviewed by ARM Perf maintainer,
could you please help review this pathset or comment about it?
Thanks a lot.
> Hi Will, Mark
>
> Could you help review arm parts of this patchset, please?
>
> For the question mention in both [1] and [2],
>
> > I'd still like Mark's Ack on this, as the approach you have taken doesn't
> > really sit with what he was suggesting.
> >
> > I also don't understand how all the CPUs get initialised with your patch,
> > since the PMU driver will be initialised after SMP is up and running.
>
> The hardlock detector utilizes the softlockup_start_all() to start all
> the cpu on watchdog_allowed_mask, which will do watchdog_nmi_enable()
> that registers perf event on each CPUs.
> Thus we simply need to retry lockup_detector_init() in a single cpu which
> will reconfig and call to softlockup_start_all().
>
> Also, the CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF selects SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR,
> IMO, this shows that hardlockup detector supports from softlockup.
>
>
> > We should know whether pNMIs are possible once we've completed
> > setup_arch() (and possibly init_IRQ()), long before SMP, so so I reckon
> > we should have all the information available once we get to
> > lockup_detector_init(), even if that requires some preparatory rework.
>
> Hardlockup depends on PMU driver , I think the only way is moving
> pmu driver at setup_arch() or any point which is earlier than
> lockup_detector_init(), and I guess we have to reorganize the architecture
> of arm PMU.
>
> The retry function should benifit all the arch/ not only for arm64.
> Any arch who needs to probe its pmu as module can use this without providing
> a chance to mess up the setup order.
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any concern about this, thank you
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAFA6WYPPgUvHCpN5=EpJ2Us5h5uVWCbBA59C-YwYQX2ovyVeEw@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210419170331.GB31045@willie-the-truck/
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list