[PATCH] perf vendor events: Add missing Neoverse V1 events
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
acme at kernel.org
Fri Sep 2 12:25:51 PDT 2022
Em Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:12:49PM +0100, Nick Forrington escreveu:
> On 02/09/2022 09:04, John Garry wrote:
> > On 01/09/2022 16:18, Nick Forrington wrote:
> > > Based on updated data from:
> > > https://github.com/ARM-software/data/blob/master/pmu/neoverse-v1.json
> > >
> > > which is based on PMU event descriptions from the Arm Neoverse V1
> > > Technical Reference Manual.
> > >
> > > This adds the following missing events:
> > > ASE_INST_SPEC
> > > SVE_INST_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_EMPTY_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_FULL_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_PARTIAL_SPEC
> > > SVE_LDFF_SPEC
> > > SVE_LDFF_FAULT_SPEC
> > > FP_SCALE_OPS_SPEC
> > > FP_FIXED_OPS_SPEC
> > >
> > > It also moves REMOTE_ACCESS from other.json to memory.json.
> >
> > Any specific reason why? I see that neoverse n2 and a76-n1 still use
> > "other" json for REMOTE_ACCESS. Nicer to be consistent.
>
> Thanks John, I agree on consistency.
>
> I think memory is a better categorisation (for all CPUs), and this is
> consistent with what I submitted for various Cortex CPUs a while back.
Were those patches processed or is some still outstanding?
> I'd be happy to remove the REMOTE_ACCESS change here and update (or not)
> REMOTE_ACCESS for Neoverse separately.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nick Forrington<nick.forrington at arm.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Apart from above:
> > Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry at huawei.com>
> Thanks, Nick
So, how should we proceed?
- Arnaldo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list