[PATCH v3 13/21] arm64/sme: Add hwcaps for SME 2 and 2.1 features

Zenghui Yu yuzenghui at huawei.com
Mon Dec 19 00:22:16 PST 2022


On 2022/11/12 5:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> In order to allow userspace to discover the presence of the new SME features
> add hwcaps for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst  | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h      |  6 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h |  6 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c         |  6 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst b/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst
> index 6fed84f935df..29a3dd1b8f5a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst
> @@ -284,6 +284,24 @@ HWCAP2_RPRFM
>  HWCAP2_SVE2P1
>      Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010.
>  
> +HWCAP2_SME2
> +    Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.SMEver == 0b0001.
> +
> +HWCAP2_SME2P1
> +    Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.SMEver == 0b0010.
> +
> +HWCAP2_SMEI16I32
> +    Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.I16I32 == 0b0101
> +
> +HWCAP2_SMEBI32I32
> +    Functionality implied by ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1.I32I32 == 0b1

s/I32I32/BI32I32/ ?

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 5b0d79f026aa..efb980ea7653 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c

> @@ -2839,11 +2847,16 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SME
>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_SME_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_SME_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME),
>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_FA64_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_FA64_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_FA64),
> +	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_SMEver_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_SMEver_SME2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME2P1),
> +	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_SMEver_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_SMEver_SME2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME2),
>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_I16I64_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_I16I64_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_I16I64),
>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F64F64_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F64F64_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_F64F64),
> +	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F64F64_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_B16B16_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_B16B16),

The *field* assignment looks wrong due to a copy-paste mistake.

s/ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F64F64_SHIFT/ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_B16B16_SHIFT/ ?

> +	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F64F64_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F16F16_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_F16F16),

ditto

>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_I8I32_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_I8I32_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_I8I32),
>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F16F32_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_F16F32_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_F16F32),
>  	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_B16F32_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_B16F32_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_B16F32),
> +	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_B16F32_SHIFT, 1, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_BI32I32_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SME_BI32I32),

ditto

and seems that HWCAP2_SMEI16I32 is missed.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list