[PATCH 07/10] crypto: Use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Sun Apr 17 01:31:09 PDT 2022


On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 04:08:22PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 01:38:15PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > If this is the case, things are already broken today. We never take
> > ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN into account when adding the driver ctx size to the
> > overall allocation size.
> 
> No it's not broken because kmalloc guarantees alignment.  For
> example, if ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is 128 bytes, then kmalloc will
> always return a pointer that's 128-byte aligned.  That guarantees
> this object and the next object are on different cache-lines.
> 
> If you reduce the kmalloc minimum alignment to 64 bytes, then
> the two neighbouring objects can share cache-lines, even if
> each object is bigger than 128 bytes (e.g., if they were 192
> bytes each).

Not with my series, the non-sharing of cache lines is preserved.
kmalloc() still returns objects aligned to a cache-line.
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN was chosen as the cover-all value for all SoCs
supported but I want to reduce the kmalloc() alignment to a cache line
size if a platform has a cache line smaller than ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN (most
arm64 SoCs have a cache line of 64 bytes rather than 128).

-- 
Catalin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list