[PATCH v2 10/10] Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Fri Apr 8 05:26:40 PDT 2022
On 2022-04-08 12:33, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 1:57 PM Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Update the documentation to get rid of the per-gpio_irq_chip
>> irq_chip structure, and give examples of the new pattern.
>
> ...
>
>> + static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> + {
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
>> + * and then call into the core code to synchronise the
>> + * state.
>> + */
>> +
>> + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
>
> (1)
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> + {
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
>
>> + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
>
> (2)
>
>> + /*
>> + * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
>> + * after having called into the core code to synchronise
>> + * the state.
>> + */
>> + }
>
> If (1) and (2) being the same is not a mistake (typo) it probably
> needs additional explanation.
Well spotted, this is definitely a copy-paste issue.
I'll fix this locally.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list