[PATCH v2 14/17] coresight: trbe: Make sure we have enough space
Suzuki K Poulose
suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Wed Sep 22 03:16:48 PDT 2021
On 22/09/2021 10:58, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 9/21/21 7:11 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> The TRBE driver makes sure that there is enough space for a meaningful
>> run, otherwise pads the given space and restarts the offset calculation
>> once. But there is no guarantee that we may find space or hit "no space".
>
> So what happens currently when it neither finds the required minimum buffer
> space for a meaningful run nor does it hit the "no space" scenario ?
It tries once today and assumes that it will either hit :
- No space
OR
- Enough space
which is reasonable, given the minimum space needed is a few bytes.
But this may no longer be true with other erratum workaround.
>
>> Make sure that we repeat the step until, either :
>> - We have the minimum space
>> OR
>> - There is NO space at all.
>>
>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> index 3373f4e2183b..02f9e00e2091 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> @@ -451,10 +451,14 @@ static unsigned long trbe_normal_offset(struct perf_output_handle *handle)
>> * If the head is too close to the limit and we don't
>> * have space for a meaningful run, we rather pad it
>> * and start fresh.
>> + *
>> + * We might have to do this more than once to make sure
>> + * we have enough required space.
>
> OR no space at all, as explained in the commit message.
> Hence this comment needs an update.
>
>> */
>> - if (limit && ((limit - head) < trbe_min_trace_buf_size(handle))) {
>> + while (limit && ((limit - head) < trbe_min_trace_buf_size(handle))) {
>> trbe_pad_buf(handle, limit - head);
>> limit = __trbe_normal_offset(handle);
>> + head = PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, buf);
>
> Should the loop be bound with a retry limit as well ?
No. We will eventually hit No-space as we keep on padding
the buffer.
Suzuki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list