[PATCH 1/3] PCI: imx: encapsulate the clock enable into one standalone function
Lucas Stach
l.stach at pengutronix.de
Wed Sep 8 01:47:39 PDT 2021
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.09.2021 um 14:59 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> No function changes, just encapsulate the i.MX PCIe clocks enable
> operations into one standalone function
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 80fc98acf097..0264432e4c4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_DATA_EN BIT(5)
> #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_PLL_EN BIT(3)
>
> +static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie);
> +
I don't think this is strictly needed. Can you just move the placement
of the new imx6_pcie_clk_enable function in the file, such that we can
avoid the forward declaration?
> static int pcie_phy_poll_ack(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, bool exp_val)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
> @@ -498,33 +500,12 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> }
> }
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_phy clock\n");
> - goto err_pcie_phy;
> - }
> -
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> + ret = imx6_pcie_clk_enable(imx6_pcie);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_bus clock\n");
> - goto err_pcie_bus;
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clocks\n");
> + goto err_clks;
> }
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clock\n");
> - goto err_pcie;
> - }
> -
> - ret = imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(imx6_pcie);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie ref clock\n");
> - goto err_ref_clk;
> - }
> -
> - /* allow the clocks to stabilize */
> - usleep_range(200, 500);
> -
> /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) {
> gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
> @@ -578,13 +559,7 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
>
> return;
>
> -err_ref_clk:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> -err_pcie:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> -err_pcie_bus:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> -err_pcie_phy:
> +err_clks:
> if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) {
> ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> if (ret)
> @@ -914,6 +889,51 @@ static void imx6_pcie_pm_turnoff(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> usleep_range(1000, 10000);
> }
>
> +static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_phy clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_bus clock\n");
> + goto err_pcie_bus;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clock\n");
> + goto err_pcie;
> + }
> +
> + ret = imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(imx6_pcie);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie ref clock\n");
> + goto err_ref_clk;
> + }
> +
> + /* allow the clocks to stabilize */
> + usleep_range(200, 500);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_ref_clk:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie);
> +err_pcie:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus);
> +err_pcie_bus:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy);
> +
> + return ret;
> +
Superfluous newline.
Regards,
Lucas
> +}
> +
> static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> {
> clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list