[PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add fsl,imx-dsp-rproc binding document

[Shengjiu Wang]

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:50 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:58 PM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 12:50 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:42 AM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:29:36 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > > > Define the compatible string and properties needed by imx_dsp_rproc
> > > > > driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang at nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml         | 131 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > >
> > > I take that back. What's the difference with this binding and
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml?
> >
> > Some devices, but two kinds of driver. one for remoteproc
> > framework,  another one is for ALSA.
> > So should I merge fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml to fsl,dsp.yaml?
>
> You can have 100 drivers for all I care, but it's 1 DT binding for 1
> piece of h/w.
>

Ok, I will merge it to fsl,dsp.yaml

Best regards
wang shengjiu