About resctrl code rebase

tan.shaopeng at fujitsu.com tan.shaopeng at fujitsu.com
Sun Sep 5 23:19:07 PDT 2021


Hi, James Morse

Thanks for your reply.

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng at fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2 at tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

I understand.
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)

I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. 

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
> 
> 
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
> 
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list