[PATCH v4] coresight: tmc-etr: Speed up for bounce buffer in flat mode
Leo Yan
leo.yan at linaro.org
Sat Sep 4 20:21:44 PDT 2021
The AUX bounce buffer is allocated with API dma_alloc_coherent(), in the
low level's architecture code, e.g. for Arm64, it maps the memory with
the attribution "Normal non-cacheable"; this can be concluded from the
definition for pgprot_dmacoherent() in arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h.
Later when access the AUX bounce buffer, since the memory mapping is
non-cacheable, it's low efficiency due to every load instruction must
reach out DRAM.
This patch changes to allocate pages with dma_alloc_noncoherent(), the
driver can access the memory via cacheable mapping; therefore, load
instructions can fetch data from cache lines rather than always read
data from DRAM, the driver can boost memory performance. After using
the cacheable mapping, the driver uses dma_sync_single_for_cpu() to
invalidate cacheline prior to read bounce buffer so can avoid read stale
trace data.
By measurement the duration for function tmc_update_etr_buffer() with
ftrace function_graph tracer, it shows the performance significant
improvement for copying 4MiB data from bounce buffer:
# echo tmc_etr_get_data_flat_buf > set_graph_notrace // avoid noise
# echo tmc_update_etr_buffer > set_graph_function
# echo function_graph > current_tracer
before:
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
2) | tmc_update_etr_buffer() {
...
2) # 8148.320 us | }
after:
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
2) | tmc_update_etr_buffer() {
...
2) # 2525.420 us | }
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
---
Changes from v3:
Refined change to use dma_alloc_noncoherent()/dma_free_noncoherent()
(Robin Murphy);
Retested functionality and performance on Juno-r2 board.
Changes from v2:
Sync the entire buffer in one go when the tracing is wrap around
(Suzuki);
Add Suzuki's review tage.
.../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
index acdb59e0e661..a049b525a274 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
@@ -609,8 +609,9 @@ static int tmc_etr_alloc_flat_buf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata,
if (!flat_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
- flat_buf->vaddr = dma_alloc_coherent(real_dev, etr_buf->size,
- &flat_buf->daddr, GFP_KERNEL);
+ flat_buf->vaddr = dma_alloc_noncoherent(real_dev, etr_buf->size,
+ &flat_buf->daddr,
+ DMA_FROM_DEVICE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!flat_buf->vaddr) {
kfree(flat_buf);
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -631,14 +632,18 @@ static void tmc_etr_free_flat_buf(struct etr_buf *etr_buf)
if (flat_buf && flat_buf->daddr) {
struct device *real_dev = flat_buf->dev->parent;
- dma_free_coherent(real_dev, flat_buf->size,
- flat_buf->vaddr, flat_buf->daddr);
+ dma_free_noncoherent(real_dev, etr_buf->size,
+ flat_buf->vaddr, flat_buf->daddr,
+ DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
}
kfree(flat_buf);
}
static void tmc_etr_sync_flat_buf(struct etr_buf *etr_buf, u64 rrp, u64 rwp)
{
+ struct etr_flat_buf *flat_buf = etr_buf->private;
+ struct device *real_dev = flat_buf->dev->parent;
+
/*
* Adjust the buffer to point to the beginning of the trace data
* and update the available trace data.
@@ -648,6 +653,19 @@ static void tmc_etr_sync_flat_buf(struct etr_buf *etr_buf, u64 rrp, u64 rwp)
etr_buf->len = etr_buf->size;
else
etr_buf->len = rwp - rrp;
+
+ /*
+ * The driver always starts tracing at the beginning of the buffer,
+ * the only reason why we would get a wrap around is when the buffer
+ * is full. Sync the entire buffer in one go for this case.
+ */
+ if (etr_buf->offset + etr_buf->len > etr_buf->size)
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(real_dev, flat_buf->daddr,
+ etr_buf->size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ else
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(real_dev,
+ flat_buf->daddr + etr_buf->offset,
+ etr_buf->len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
}
static ssize_t tmc_etr_get_data_flat_buf(struct etr_buf *etr_buf,
--
2.25.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list