[PATCH v4 09/14] irqchip: Provide platform_device to of_irq_init_cb_t

Florian Fainelli f.fainelli at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 08:14:07 PDT 2021



On 10/20/2021 1:24 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:23:52 +0100,
> Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>   On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:43 PM Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip.h b/include/linux/irqchip.h
>>> index ccf32758ea85..146a9d80a6a2 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip.h
>>> @@ -33,7 +33,15 @@ extern int platform_irqchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
>>>   #define IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN(drv_name) \
>>>   static const struct of_device_id drv_name##_irqchip_match_table[] = {
>>>
>>> -#define IRQCHIP_MATCH(compat, fn) { .compatible = compat, .data = fn },
>>> +/* Undefined on purpose */
>>> +int typecheck_irq_init_cb(struct device_node *, struct device_node *,
>>> +                         struct platform_device *);
>>> +
>>> +#define typecheck_irq_init_cb(fn)                                      \
>>> +       __typecheck(typecheck_irq_init_cb, fn) ? fn : fn
>>
>> That's nice! Shouldn't it also be used for IRQCHIP_DECLARE?
> 
> Absolutely. And enabling this shows that changing of_irq_init_cb_t
> breaks *all users* of IRQCHIP_DECLARE(). Not an acceptable outcome
> when we're at -rc5. >
> Why can't the relevant drivers use of_find_device_by_node() instead?
> That would allow us to keep the status-quo on of_irq_init_cb_t.

Rob had suggested several solutions, including using 
of_find_device_by_node(), however updating of_irq_init_cb_t was 
indicated to be the better way. I had intentionally not updated 
IRQCHIP_DECLARE() because it would ignore the 3rd argument we passed to 
it (platform_device *) so I thought.

If I am spinning a v6 using of_find_device_by_node() would that be 
acceptable to you?
-- 
Florian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list