Question WRT early IRQ/NMI entry code
Thomas Gleixner
tglx at linutronix.de
Tue Nov 30 05:47:01 PST 2021
On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 12:28, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> while going over the IRQ/NMI entry code I've found a small 'inconsistency':
> while in the IRQ entry path, we inform RCU of the context change *before*
> incrementing the preempt counter, the opposite happens for the NMI entry
> path. This applies to both arm64 and x86[1].
>
> Actually, rcu_nmi_enter() — which is also the main RCU context switch function
> for the IRQ entry path — uses the preempt counter to verify it's not in NMI
> context. So it would make sense to assume all callers have the same updated
> view of the preempt count, which isn't true ATM.
>
> I'm sure there an obscure/non-obvious reason for this, right?
There is.
> IRQ path:
> -> x86_64 asm (entry_64.S)
> -> irqentry_enter() -> rcu_irq_enter() -> *rcu_nmi_enter()*
> -> run_irq_on_irqstack_cond() -> irq_exit_rcu() -> *preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET)*
> -> // Run IRQ...
>
> NMI path:
> -> x86_64 asm (entry_64.S)
> -> irqentry_nmi_enter() -> __nmi_enter() -> *__preempt_count_add(NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET)*
> -> *rcu_nmi_enter()*
The reason is symmetry vs. returning from interupt / exception:
irqentry_enter()
exit_rcu = false;
if (user_mode(regs)) {
irqentry_enter_from_user_mode(regs)
__enter_from_user_mode(regs)
user_exit_irqoff(); <- RCU handling for NOHZ full
} else if (is_idle_task_current()) {
rcu_irq_enter()
exit_rcu = true;
}
irq_enter_rcu()
__irq_enter_raw()
preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
irq_handler()
irq_exit_rcu()
preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
invoke_softirq();
irqentry_exit(regs, exit_rcu)
if (user_mode(regs)) {
irqentry_exit_to_usermode(regs)
user_enter_irqoff(); <- RCU handling for NOHZ full
} else if (irqs_enabled(regs)) {
if (exit_rcu) { <- Idle task special case
rcu_irq_exit();
} else {
irqentry_exit_cond_resched();
}
} else if (exit_rcu) {
rcu_irq_exit();
}
On return from interrupt HARDIRQ_OFFSET has to be removed _before_
handling soft interrupts. It's also required that the preempt count has
the original state _before_ reaching irqentry_exit() which
might schedule if the interrupt/exception hit user space or kernel space
with interrupts enabled.
So doing it symmetric makes sense.
For NMIs the above conditionals do not apply at all and we just do
__nmi_enter()
preempt_count_add(NMI_COUNT + HARDIRQ_COUNT);
rcu_nmi_enter();
handle_nmi();
rcu_nmi_exit();
__nmi_exit()
preempt_count_sub(NMI_COUNT + HARDIRQ_COUNT);
The reason why preempt count is incremented before invoking
rcu_nmi_enter() is simply that RCU has to know about being in NMI
context, i.e. in_nmi() has to return the correct answer.
Thanks,
tglx
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list