(EXT) Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] arm64: dts: imx8mm-beacon: Enable OV5640 Camera

Alexander Stein alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com
Mon Nov 22 23:38:47 PST 2021


Am Dienstag, dem 23.11.2021 um 02:15 +0200 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 09:07:26PM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:18 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 10:54:26AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > > The baseboard has support for a TDNext 5640 Camera which
> > > > uses an OV5640 connected to a 2-lane CSI2 interface.
> > > > 
> > > > With the CSI and mipi_csi2 drivers pointing to an OV5640
> > > > camera, the media
> > > > pipeline can be configured with the following:
> > > > 
> > > >     media-ctl --links "'ov5640 1-003c':0->'imx7-mipi-
> > > > csis.0':0[1]"
> > > > 
> > > > The camera and various nodes in the pipeline can be configured
> > > > for UYVY:
> > > >     media-ctl -v -V "'ov5640 1-003c':0 [fmt:UYVY8_1X16/640x480
> > > > field:none]"
> > > >     media-ctl -v -V "'csi':0 [fmt:UYVY8_1X16/640x480
> > > > field:none]"
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <
> > > > aford173 at gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > 
> > > As the ov5640 is on an add-on module, would a DT overlay be
> > > better ?
> > 
> > At least for the Beacon / LogicPD boards, I would prefer to avoid
> > the
> > overlays.  We have an i.M6Q and an OMAP3 board with cameras enabled
> > in
> > our development kit device trees.  If the cameras are not
> > connected,
> > they just display a message that the cameras are not communicating
> > and
> > move on.  I'm OK with that.
> 
> You know the board better than I do, so I won't push against this,
> but I
> still think it may not lead to the best user experience, especially
> if a
> user wanted to connect a different sensor to the development board.

I see the advantages of overlays compared to "stacked" .dts files. But
is there any general supported interface how to actually apply an
overlay?
Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst
states of_overlay_fdt_apply() but there is only exactly one user in-
kernel (rcar-du). Is it expected that the bootloader like u-boot shall
apply the .dtbo files?

Best regards,
Alexander




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list