[PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: separate the common code from machine driver
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Tue Nov 16 06:59:30 PST 2021
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:33:48PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> Is the reply from YC clear? Any suggestion would be appreciated. If you
> need more information, please let us know.
Not really. It's super high level and only at the driver level, not
talking about the hardware much. As far as I can see it's showing a
single physical system and even seems to have what looks like it's
supposed to be two cards connected together which really seems like
it's a single device.
> Additionally, it was my understanding you suggested that DSP routes
> should be configurable in some ways, and we should not just add a new
> driver for SOF in case we need to support some other interface
> combinations in the future. If I'm wrong, please kindly correct me.
Yes, I'd not expect a separate driver depending on system configuration.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20211116/c12ee26c/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list