[PATCH v3 20/25] mtd: spi-nor: sst: sst26vf064b: Init flash based on SFDP

[Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com]

On 11/9/21 2:25 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Am 2021-10-29 19:31, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus at microchip.com:
>> On 10/29/21 8:26 PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> Get rid of the static initialization of the flash parameters and
>>> init them when parsing SFDP.
>>> Generated a 256 Kbyte random data and did an erase, write, read back
>>> and compare test. The flash uses for reads SPINOR_OP_READ_1_4_4 0xeb,
>>> for erases SPINOR_OP_BE_4K 0x20, and for writes SPINOR_OP_PP 0x02.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus at microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> root at sama5d2-xplained:~# cat
>> /sys/devices/platform/ahb/ahb:apb/f0020000.spi/spi_master/spi1/spi1.0/spi-nor/jedec_id
>> bf2643
>> root at sama5d2-xplained:~# cat
>> /sys/devices/platform/ahb/ahb:apb/f0020000.spi/spi_master/spi1/spi1.0/spi-nor/manufacturer
>> sst
>> root at sama5d2-xplained:~# cat
>> /sys/devices/platform/ahb/ahb:apb/f0020000.spi/spi_master/spi1/spi1.0/spi-nor/partname
>> sst26vf064b
>> root at sama5d2-xplained:~# cat
>> /sys/devices/platform/ahb/ahb:apb/f0020000.spi/spi_master/spi1/spi1.0/spi-nor/sfdp
>> > sst26vf064b-sfdp
>> root at sama5d2-xplained:~# hexdump sst26vf064b-sfdp
> 
> xxd please, and md5sum or sha256sum or really any
> checksum is missing.
> 

right, I forgot the checksum.
Just curious, why do you prefer xxd over hexdump? Does it matter
which tool we use?

> same goes for the other flashes.

ok, will do.