[RFC PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Reiji Watanabe
reijiw at google.com
Tue Nov 2 23:25:09 PDT 2021
Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1b4ffbf539a7..ec984fd4e319 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -817,9 +817,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
- .ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
- U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
- U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3407,10 +3404,86 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
return write_demux_regids(uindices);
}
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+ u32 id;
+ u32 shift;
+ u32 frac_id;
+ u32 frac_shift;
+ u8 frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+ },
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+ },
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+ },
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function only checks fractional feature field and assumes
+ * the feature field is valid.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+ u32 id;
+ int fval, flim, ret;
+ u64 val, lim, mask;
+ const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+ bool sign = FCT_SIGN(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+ enum feature_check_type type = FCT_TYPE(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+
+ /* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+ id = ftr_frac->id;
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+ val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+ lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+
+ mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+ if ((val & mask) != (lim & mask))
+ /*
+ * The feature level is smaller than the limit.
+ * Any fractional version should be fine.
+ */
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Check the fractional feature field */
+ id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+ val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+ fval = cpuid_feature_extract_field(val, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+ lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+ flim = cpuid_feature_extract_field(lim, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+ ret = arm64_check_feature_one(type, fval, flim);
+ return ret ? -E2BIG : 0;
+}
+
int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int i;
+ int i, err;
const struct kvm_vcpu *t_vcpu;
+ const struct feature_frac *frac;
/*
* Make sure vcpu->arch.has_run_once is visible for others so that
@@ -3431,6 +3504,17 @@ int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM))
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+ * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+ frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+ err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -3438,6 +3522,9 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
{
int i;
struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+ struct feature_frac *frac;
+ u64 mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
+ u64 org;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3533,32 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+ frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+
+ /*
+ * An ID register that has fractional fields is expected
+ * to have its own id_reg_info.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Update the id_reg's ftr_check_types for the fractional
+ * field with FCT_IGNORE so that the field won't be validated
+ * when the ID register is set by userspace, which could
+ * temporarily cause an inconsistency if its (main) feature
+ * field is not set yet. Save the original ftr_check_types
+ * for the fractional field to validate the field later.
+ */
+ org = (id_reg->ftr_check_types >> frac->frac_shift) & mask;
+ id_reg->ftr_check_types &= ~(mask << frac->frac_shift);
+ id_reg->ftr_check_types |=
+ MAKE_FCT(frac->frac_shift, FCT_IGNORE, FCT_SIGN(org));
+ frac->frac_ftr_check = org;
+ }
}
void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
--
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list