[PATCH] ACPI/IORT: Handle device properties with software node API

Hanjun Guo guohanjun at huawei.com
Thu May 13 17:42:36 PDT 2021


On 2021/5/11 21:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus at linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>> The older device property API is going to be removed.
>> Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
>> node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
>>
>> Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
>> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus<heikki.krogerus at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index 3912a1f6058e5..e34937e11186a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ static void iort_named_component_init(struct device *dev,
>>                                        FIELD_GET(ACPI_IORT_NC_PASID_BITS,
>>                                                  nc->node_flags));
>>
>> -       if (device_add_properties(dev, props))
>> +       if (device_create_managed_software_node(dev, props, NULL))
>>                  dev_warn(dev, "Could not add device properties\n");
>>   }
>>
>> --
> Thanks!
> 
> I can take this through the ACPI tree if there are no objections.

Since this is related to device property API refactor, I'm
fine with it.

Lorenzo, what's your position?

Thanks
Hanjun



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list