[PATCH v6 06/10] libperf: Add support for user space counter access
Ian Rogers
irogers at google.com
Tue May 4 14:40:52 PDT 2021
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:08 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> x86 and arm64 can both support direct access of event counters in
> userspace. The access sequence is less than trivial and currently exists
> in perf test code (tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c) with copies in
> projects such as PAPI and libpfm4.
>
> In order to support usersapce access, an event must be mmapped first
> with perf_evsel__mmap(). Then subsequent calls to perf_evsel__read()
> will use the fast path (assuming the arch supports it).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> ---
> v6:
> - Adapt to mmap changes adding MMAP NULL check
> v5:
> - Make raw count s64 instead of u64 so that counter width shifting
> works
> - Adapt to mmap changes
> v4:
> - Update perf_evsel__mmap size to pages
> v3:
> - Split out perf_evsel__mmap() to separate patch
> ---
> tools/lib/perf/evsel.c | 4 ++
> tools/lib/perf/include/internal/mmap.h | 3 +
> tools/lib/perf/mmap.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 160 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> index 1057e9b15528..4d67343d36c9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,10 @@ int perf_evsel__read(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> if (FD(evsel, cpu, thread) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (MMAP(evsel, cpu, thread) &&
> + !perf_mmap__read_self(MMAP(evsel, cpu, thread), count))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (readn(FD(evsel, cpu, thread), count->values, size) <= 0)
> return -errno;
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/mmap.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/mmap.h
> index be7556e0a2b2..5e3422f40ed5 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/mmap.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/mmap.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #define PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE (1 << 16)
>
> struct perf_mmap;
> +struct perf_counts_values;
>
> typedef void (*libperf_unmap_cb_t)(struct perf_mmap *map);
>
> @@ -52,4 +53,6 @@ void perf_mmap__put(struct perf_mmap *map);
>
> u64 perf_mmap__read_head(struct perf_mmap *map);
>
> +int perf_mmap__read_self(struct perf_mmap *map, struct perf_counts_values *count);
> +
> #endif /* __LIBPERF_INTERNAL_MMAP_H */
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> index 79d5ed6c38cc..915469f00cf4 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <perf/mmap.h>
> #include <perf/event.h>
> +#include <perf/evsel.h>
> #include <internal/mmap.h>
> #include <internal/lib.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> void perf_mmap__init(struct perf_mmap *map, struct perf_mmap *prev,
> @@ -273,3 +275,89 @@ union perf_event *perf_mmap__read_event(struct perf_mmap *map)
>
> return event;
> }
> +
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> +static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter)
> +{
> + unsigned int low, high;
> +
> + asm volatile("rdpmc" : "=a" (low), "=d" (high) : "c" (counter));
> +
> + return low | ((u64)high) << 32;
> +}
> +
> +static u64 read_timestamp(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int low, high;
> +
> + asm volatile("rdtsc" : "=a" (low), "=d" (high));
> +
> + return low | ((u64)high) << 32;
> +}
> +#else
> +static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter) { return 0; }
> +static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> +int perf_mmap__read_self(struct perf_mmap *map, struct perf_counts_values *count)
> +{
> + struct perf_event_mmap_page *pc = map->base;
> + u32 seq, idx, time_mult = 0, time_shift = 0;
> + u64 cnt, cyc = 0, time_offset = 0, time_cycles = 0, time_mask = ~0ULL;
> +
> + if (!pc || !pc->cap_user_rdpmc)
> + return -1;
> +
> + do {
> + seq = READ_ONCE(pc->lock);
> + barrier();
> +
> + count->ena = READ_ONCE(pc->time_enabled);
> + count->run = READ_ONCE(pc->time_running);
> +
> + if (pc->cap_user_time && count->ena != count->run) {
> + cyc = read_timestamp();
> + time_mult = READ_ONCE(pc->time_mult);
> + time_shift = READ_ONCE(pc->time_shift);
> + time_offset = READ_ONCE(pc->time_offset);
> +
> + if (pc->cap_user_time_short) {
> + time_cycles = READ_ONCE(pc->time_cycles);
> + time_mask = READ_ONCE(pc->time_mask);
> + }
Nit, this is now out of sync with the comment code in perf_event.h.
> + }
> +
> + idx = READ_ONCE(pc->index);
> + cnt = READ_ONCE(pc->offset);
> + if (pc->cap_user_rdpmc && idx) {
> + s64 evcnt = read_perf_counter(idx - 1);
> + u16 width = READ_ONCE(pc->pmc_width);
> +
> + evcnt <<= 64 - width;
> + evcnt >>= 64 - width;
> + cnt += evcnt;
> + } else
> + return -1;
> +
> + barrier();
> + } while (READ_ONCE(pc->lock) != seq);
> +
> + if (count->ena != count->run) {
> + u64 delta;
> +
> + /* Adjust for cap_usr_time_short, a nop if not */
> + cyc = time_cycles + ((cyc - time_cycles) & time_mask);
> +
> + delta = time_offset + mul_u64_u32_shr(cyc, time_mult, time_shift);
> +
> + count->ena += delta;
> + if (idx)
> + count->run += delta;
> +
> + cnt = mul_u64_u64_div64(cnt, count->ena, count->run);
Does this still suffer the divide by zero if multiplexing hasn't run
the counter? If so, we still need to add something like:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fVRdqvswtyQMg5cB+ntTGda+SAYskjTQednEH-AeZo13g@mail.gmail.com/
> + }
> +
> + count->val = cnt;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> index 0ad82d7a2a51..54fb4809b9ee 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,69 @@ static int test_stat_thread_enable(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int test_stat_user_read(int event)
> +{
> + struct perf_counts_values counts = { .val = 0 };
> + struct perf_thread_map *threads;
> + struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> + struct perf_event_mmap_page *pc;
> + struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> + .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> + .config = event,
> + };
A nit, previously test-evsel was able to run and pass on a hypervisor.
As now there is a reliance on hardware events the evsel open fails on
a hypervisor. It'd be nice if we could detect running on a hypervisor
and test software events in that case.
Thanks,
Ian
> + int err, i;
> +
> + threads = perf_thread_map__new_dummy();
> + __T("failed to create threads", threads);
> +
> + perf_thread_map__set_pid(threads, 0, 0);
> +
> + evsel = perf_evsel__new(&attr);
> + __T("failed to create evsel", evsel);
> +
> + err = perf_evsel__open(evsel, NULL, threads);
> + __T("failed to open evsel", err == 0);
> +
> + err = perf_evsel__mmap(evsel, 0);
> + __T("failed to mmap evsel", err == 0);
> +
> + pc = perf_evsel__mmap_base(evsel, 0, 0);
> +
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> + __T("userspace counter access not supported", pc->cap_user_rdpmc);
> + __T("userspace counter access not enabled", pc->index);
> + __T("userspace counter width not set", pc->pmc_width >= 32);
> +#endif
> +
> + perf_evsel__read(evsel, 0, 0, &counts);
> + __T("failed to read value for evsel", counts.val != 0);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + volatile int count = 0x10000 << i;
> + __u64 start, end, last = 0;
> +
> + __T_VERBOSE("\tloop = %u, ", count);
> +
> + perf_evsel__read(evsel, 0, 0, &counts);
> + start = counts.val;
> +
> + while (count--) ;
> +
> + perf_evsel__read(evsel, 0, 0, &counts);
> + end = counts.val;
> +
> + __T("invalid counter data", (end - start) > last);
> + last = end - start;
> + __T_VERBOSE("count = %llu\n", end - start);
> + }
> +
> + perf_evsel__close(evsel);
> + perf_evsel__delete(evsel);
> +
> + perf_thread_map__put(threads);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> __T_START;
> @@ -129,6 +192,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> test_stat_cpu();
> test_stat_thread();
> test_stat_thread_enable();
> + test_stat_user_read(PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS);
> + test_stat_user_read(PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES);
>
> __T_END;
> return tests_failed == 0 ? 0 : -1;
> --
> 2.27.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list