[RFC PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: Add bindings documentation for RISC-V idle states

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Tue Mar 16 17:54:09 GMT 2021


On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:11:39 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> The RISC-V CPU idle states will be described in DT under the
> /cpus/idle-states DT node. This patch adds the bindings documentation
> for riscv-idle-states DT nodes and idle state DT nodes under it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml       |   6 +
>  .../bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml           | 256 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 262 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-retentive-0-0:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-nonretentive-0-0:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-retentive-0:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-nonretentive-0:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-retentive-1-0:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-nonretentive-1-0:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-retentive-1:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-nonretentive-1:compatible:0: 'arm,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-retention-0-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-retention-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-sleep-0-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-sleep-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-retention-1-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-retention-1:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-sleep-1-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-sleep-1:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: 'entry-method' does not match any of the regexes: '^(cpu|cluster)-', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-sleep-0-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-sleep-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-sleep-1-0:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cluster-sleep-1:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml: idle-states: cpu-power-down:compatible:0: 'riscv,idle-state' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1453810

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list