[PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6q-dhcom: Add PU,VDD1P1,VDD2P5 regulators

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Fri Mar 5 11:19:25 GMT 2021


On 3/5/21 9:39 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:07:32PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 3/4/21 8:56 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:04:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 3/3/21 1:56 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> Per schematic, both PU and SOC regulator are supplied from LTC3676 SW1
>>>>>> via VDDSOC_IN rail, add the PU input. Both VDD1P1, VDD2P5 are supplied
>>>>>> from LTC3676 SW2 via VDDHIGH_IN rail, add both inputs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 52c7a088badd ("ARM: dts: imx6q: Add support for the DHCOM iMX6 SoM and PDK2")
>>>>>
>>>>> It's more like an improvement or additions rather than fixes.  I dropped
>>>>> the tag and applied for -next.
>>>>
>>>> I would argue that describing SoC regulators correctly is a bugfix, since it
>>>> can lead to stability issues of the SoC.
>>>
>>> Then resend the patch with details of the issue that it fixes.
>>
>> Can you please tell me what is missing in the original patch description
>> that justifies dropping the Fixes: tag ? I would argue that fully describing
>> CPU regulators in DT is a fix which should go through the stable tree and
>> the original patch description is accurate.
> 
> You claim that the patch fixes a stability issue, but commit log
> mentions nothing about it.

Correction, I claim it can lead to stability issues, so far none were 
observed to my knowledge. But I would argue a correct regulator setup in 
DT for a specific device is a bugfix and should go through stable tree. 
Please correct me if I'm wrong.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list