[PATCH v4] recordmcount: Correct st_shndx handling

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:02:27 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:41:26 +0800
> Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
> > 
> > One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When
> > SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0.
> > 
> > This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz at infradead.org>
> > Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com>
> > [handle endianness of sym->st_shndx]
> > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai at mediatek.com>
> > ---  
> 
> Thanks, I pulled this in and started the testing.
> 

It passed my normal tests. I'll run my cross compile test, and I just
pushed it to linux-next. I'll wait a few days before I push it to Linus.

-- Steve