[PATCH v14 00/12] add ecspi ERR009165 for i.mx6/7 soc family

Vinod Koul vkoul at kernel.org
Wed Jun 16 03:16:24 PDT 2021


On 15-06-21, 14:10, Robin Gong wrote:
> On 15/06/21 20:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On 15-06-21, 06:36, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > On 15/06/21 14:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On 15-06-21, 01:55, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > > > On 06/11/21 21:51 Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Without this series, SPI DMA does not work on i.MX8MM:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  [   41.315984] spi_master spi1: I/O Error in DMA RX
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I applied your series and SPI DMA works now:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
> > > > > Thanks Fabio.
> > > > > Hello Vinod, Mark,
> > > > > Is my patch set good enough to merge? I remember someone else are
> > > > > requesting it from last year like Fabio.
> > > >
> > > > I have acked the last dmaengine patch, is there any else required from me?
> > > > Which tree will be this merged thru?
> > > Thanks Vinod, mainline is enough I think.
> > 
> > I meant which subsystem tree will this go thru :)
> I thought the patches with 'spi' tag could be merged into spi tree while
> 'dmaengine' merged into dmaengine tree, the rest of dts patch merged
> into i.mx branch. But from HW errata view, maybe merging all into i.mx
> branch is a better way?

Are there any dependecies between patches? If not all can merge thru
respective subsystem. You already have the ack, so I dont mind if you
pick thru imx tree

-- 
~Vinod



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list