[PATCH v8] thermal: mediatek: add another get_temp ops for thermal sensors
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Mon Jun 14 09:58:15 PDT 2021
On 03/06/2021 13:00, Ben Tseng wrote:
> From: Michael Kao <michael.kao at mediatek.com>
>
> Provide thermal zone to read thermal sensor
> in the SoC. We can read all the thermal sensors
> value in the SoC by the node /sys/class/thermal/
>
> In mtk_thermal_bank_temperature, return -EAGAIN instead of -EACCESS
> on the first read of sensor that often are bogus values.
> This can avoid following warning on boot:
>
> thermal thermal_zone6: failed to read out thermal zone (-13)
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kao <michael.kao at mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Tseng <ben.tseng at mediatek.com>
>
> ---
>
> This patchset supports for MT8183 chip to mtk_thermal.c.
> Add thermal zone of all the thermal sensor in SoC for
> another get temperatrue. They don't need to thermal throttle.
> And we bind coolers for thermal zone nodes of cpu_thermal.
>
> Changes in V8:
> - Rebase to kernel-v5.13-rc1
> - Resend
>
> Changes in v7:
> - Fix build error in v6.
>
> Changes in v6:
> - Rebase to kernel-5.11-rc1.
> - [1/3]
> - add interrupts property.
> - [2/3]
> - add the Tested-by in the commit message.
> - [3/3]
> - use the mt->conf->msr[id] instead of conf->msr[id] in the
> _get_sensor_temp and mtk_thermal_bank_temperature.
> - remove the redundant space in _get_sensor_temp and
> mtk_read_sensor_temp.
> - change kmalloc to dev_kmalloc in mtk_thermal_probe.
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Rebase to kernel-5.9-rc1.
> - Revise the title of cover letter.
> - Drop "[v4,7/7] thermal: mediatek: use spinlock to protect PTPCORESEL"
> - [2/2]
> - Add the judgement to the version of raw_to_mcelsius.
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Rebase to kernel-5.6-rc1.
> - [1/7]
> - Squash thermal zone settings in the dtsi from [v3,5/8]
> arm64: dts: mt8183: Increase polling frequency for CPU thermal zone.
> - Remove the property of interrupts and mediatek,hw-reset-temp.
> - [2/7]
> - Correct commit message.
> - [4/7]
> - Change the target temperature to the 80C and change the commit message.
> - [6/7]
> - Adjust newline alignment.
> - Fix the judgement on the return value of registering thermal zone.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebase to kernel-5.5-rc1.
> - [1/8]
> - Update sustainable power of cpu, tzts1~5 and tztsABB.
> - [7/8]
> - Bypass the failure that non cpu_thermal sensor is not find in thermal-zones
> in dts, which is normal for mt8173, so prompt a warning here instead of
> failing.
>
> Return -EAGAIN instead of -EACCESS on the first read of sensor that
> often are bogus values. This can avoid following warning on boot:
>
> thermal thermal_zone6: failed to read out thermal zone (-13)
>
> Changes in v2:
> - [1/8]
> - Add the sustainable-power,trips,cooling-maps to the tzts1~tztsABB.
> - [4/8]
> - Add the min opp of cpu throttle.
>
> Matthias Kaehlcke (1):
> arm64: dts: mt8183: Configure CPU cooling
>
> Michael Kao (2):
> thermal: mediatek: add another get_temp ops for thermal sensors
> arm64: dts: mt8183: add thermal zone node
> ---
> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
> index 97e8678..b6bee451 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,11 @@ enum mtk_thermal_version {
>
> struct mtk_thermal;
>
> +struct mtk_thermal_zone {
> + struct mtk_thermal *mt;
> + int id;
> +};
How does it differ from 'struct mtk_thermal_bank' ?
> struct thermal_bank_cfg {
> unsigned int num_sensors;
> const int *sensors;
> @@ -637,6 +642,30 @@ static void mtk_thermal_put_bank(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
> mutex_unlock(&mt->lock);
> }
>
> +static u32 _get_sensor_temp(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int id)
> +{
> + u32 raw;
> + int temp;
> +
> + raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + mt->conf->msr[id]);
> +
> + if (mt->conf->version == MTK_THERMAL_V1)
> + temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v1(mt, id, raw);
> + else
> + temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v2(mt, id, raw);
Please add the proper conversion function as a callback and set it at
probe time, instead of checking at every call.
> + /*
> + * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus
> + * temperature value. Filter these out so that the system does
> + * not immediately shut down.
> + */
If it happens only once, why not call this function at probe time so
this test won't be needed.
> + if (temp > 200000)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + else
> + return temp;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * mtk_thermal_bank_temperature - get the temperature of a bank
> * @bank: The bank
> @@ -647,28 +676,11 @@ static void mtk_thermal_put_bank(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
> static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
> {
> struct mtk_thermal *mt = bank->mt;
> - const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf;
> int i, temp = INT_MIN, max = INT_MIN;
> - u32 raw;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < conf->bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) {
> - raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + conf->msr[i]);
>
> - if (mt->conf->version == MTK_THERMAL_V1) {
> - temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v1(
> - mt, conf->bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i], raw);
> - } else {
> - temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v2(
> - mt, conf->bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i], raw);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) {
>
> - /*
> - * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus
> - * temperature value. Filter these out so that the system does
> - * not immediately shut down.
> - */
> - if (temp > 200000)
> - temp = 0;
> + temp = _get_sensor_temp(mt, i);
>
> if (temp > max)
> max = temp;
> @@ -679,7 +691,8 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
>
> static int mtk_read_temp(void *data, int *temperature)
> {
> - struct mtk_thermal *mt = data;
> + struct mtk_thermal_zone *tz = data;
> + struct mtk_thermal *mt = tz->mt;
> int i;
> int tempmax = INT_MIN;
>
> @@ -698,10 +711,28 @@ static int mtk_read_temp(void *data, int *temperature)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int mtk_read_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temperature)
> +{
> + struct mtk_thermal_zone *tz = data;
> + struct mtk_thermal *mt = tz->mt;
> + int id = tz->id - 1;
> +
> + if (id < 0)
> + return -EACCES;
How this can happen ?
> +
> + *temperature = _get_sensor_temp(mt, id);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops mtk_thermal_ops = {
> .get_temp = mtk_read_temp,
> };
>
> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops mtk_thermal_sensor_ops = {
> + .get_temp = mtk_read_sensor_temp,
> +};
> +
> static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
> u32 apmixed_phys_base, u32 auxadc_phys_base,
> int ctrl_id)
> @@ -992,6 +1023,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u64 auxadc_phys_base, apmixed_phys_base;
> struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev;
> void __iomem *apmixed_base, *auxadc_base;
> + struct mtk_thermal_zone *tz;
>
> mt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mt), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mt)
> @@ -1080,11 +1112,29 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mt);
>
> - tzdev = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, 0, mt,
> - &mtk_thermal_ops);
> - if (IS_ERR(tzdev)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(tzdev);
> - goto err_disable_clk_peri_therm;
> + for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_sensors + 1; i++) {
> + tz = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tz), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tz)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + tz->mt = mt;
> + tz->id = i;
> +
> + tzdev = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, i, tz, (i == 0) ?
> + &mtk_thermal_ops :
> + &mtk_thermal_sensor_ops);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(tzdev)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(tzdev) == -ENODEV) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> + "sensor %d not registered in thermal zone in dt\n", i);
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (PTR_ERR(tzdev) == -EACCES) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(tzdev);
> + goto err_disable_clk_peri_therm;
> + }
If the error is none of the above, the loop continues. Is that what you
want ?
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list