[PATCH v10 8/9] drm/mediatek: add DDP support for MT8183

Hsin-Yi Wang hsinyi at chromium.org
Thu Jan 28 01:15:47 EST 2021


On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:13 PM CK Hu <ck.hu at mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Hsin-Yi:
>
> Modify the title's prefix to 'soc: mediatek:'
>
> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:54 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu at mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add DDP support for MT8183 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu at mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index f531b119da7a9..f64e9c33e85ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> >
> >  #define MT2701_MUTEX0_MOD0                   0x2c
> >  #define MT2701_MUTEX0_SOF0                   0x30
> > +#define MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0                      0x30
> > +#define MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0                      0x2c
>
> Modify 'DISP_MUTEX' to 'MUTEX'
>
> >
> >  #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(n)                 (0x20 + 0x20 * (n))
> >  #define DISP_REG_MUTEX(n)                    (0x24 + 0x20 * (n))
> > @@ -37,6 +39,18 @@
> >  #define MT8167_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER         15
> >  #define MT8167_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_UFOE           16
> >
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0          0
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA1          1
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0           9
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0_2L                10
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1_2L                11
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA0          12
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0         13
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR0         14
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL0           15
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA0         16
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0                17
> > +
> >  #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0           11
> >  #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1           12
> >  #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0          13
> > @@ -87,6 +101,12 @@
> >  #define MT2712_MUTEX_SOF_DSI3                        6
> >  #define MT8167_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0                        2
> >  #define MT8167_MUTEX_SOF_DPI1                        3
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DSI0                        1
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0                        2
> > +
> > +/* Add EOF setting so overlay hardware can receive frame done irq */
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0                        (MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 << 6)
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DPI0                        (MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 << 6)
> >

Hi CK, comment is added here. I can move to mt8183_mutex_sof if preferred.

> >  struct mtk_mutex {
> >       int id;
> > @@ -181,6 +201,20 @@ static const unsigned int mt8173_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> >       [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA1] = MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA1,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const unsigned int mt8183_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0_2L,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L1] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1_2L,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA1,
> > +     [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA0,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const unsigned int mt2712_mutex_sof[MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> >       [MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE] = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> >       [MUTEX_SOF_DSI0] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI0,
> > @@ -198,6 +232,12 @@ static const unsigned int mt8167_mutex_sof[MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> >       [MUTEX_SOF_DPI1] = MT8167_MUTEX_SOF_DPI1,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const unsigned int mt8183_mutex_sof[MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> > +     [MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE] = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> > +     [MUTEX_SOF_DSI0] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 | MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0,
> > +     [MUTEX_SOF_DPI0] = MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 | MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DPI0,
>
> According to discussion in [1], add comment for the odd EOF setting.
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1595469798-3824-8-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com/
>
> Regards,
> CK.
>
>
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt2701_mutex_driver_data = {
> >       .mutex_mod = mt2701_mutex_mod,
> >       .mutex_sof = mt2712_mutex_sof,
> > @@ -227,6 +267,14 @@ static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8173_mutex_driver_data = {
> >       .mutex_sof_reg = MT2701_MUTEX0_SOF0,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8183_mutex_driver_data = {
> > +     .mutex_mod = mt8183_mutex_mod,
> > +     .mutex_sof = mt8183_mutex_sof,
> > +     .mutex_mod_reg = MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
> > +     .mutex_sof_reg = MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0,
> > +     .no_clk = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct mtk_mutex *mtk_mutex_get(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >       struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > @@ -457,6 +505,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> >         .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> >       { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> >         .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > +     { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-disp-mutex",
> > +       .data = &mt8183_mutex_driver_data},
> >       {},
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list