[PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Refactor filtering of ID registers

[Marc Zyngier]

Our current ID register filtering is starting to be a mess of if()
statements, and isn't going to get any saner.

Let's turn it into a switch(), which has a chance of being more
readable, and introduce a FEATURE() macro that allows easy generation
of feature masks.

No functionnal change intended.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 2bea0494b81d..dda16d60197b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  *          Christoffer Dall <c.dall at virtualopensystems.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/bsearch.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -1016,6 +1017,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+#define FEATURE(x)	(GENMASK_ULL(x##_SHIFT + 3, x##_SHIFT))
+
 /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
 static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
@@ -1024,36 +1027,38 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
 	u64 val = raz ? 0 : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
 
-	if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) {
+	switch (id) {
+	case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1:
 		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
-			val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
-		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT);
-		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
-		val |= ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
-		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT);
-		val |= ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3 << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT);
-	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) {
-		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
-	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 && !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
-		val &= ~((0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT) |
-			 (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT) |
-			 (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA_SHIFT) |
-			 (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_SHIFT));
-	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) {
-		u64 cap = 0;
-
+			val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
+		val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_AMU);
+		val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2);
+		val |= FIELD_PREP(FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2);
+		val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3);
+		val |= FIELD_PREP(FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3);
+		break;
+	case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
+		val &= ~FEATURE(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
+		break;
+	case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
+		if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
+			val &= ~(FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |
+				 FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_API) |
+				 FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA) |
+				 FEATURE(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI));
+		break;
+	case SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1:
 		/* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.1 */
-		if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
-			cap = ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_1;
-
 		val = cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(val,
-						ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT,
-						cap);
-	} else if (id == SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) {
+						      ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT,
+						      kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) ? ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_1 : 0);
+		break;
+	case SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1:
 		/* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.1 */
 		val = cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(val,
 						      ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT,
 						      kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) ? ID_DFR0_PERFMON_8_1 : 0);
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return val;
-- 
2.29.2