[PATCH 1/6] media: uapi: Add MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRGB_IGIG_GBGR_IGIG media bus formats

[Marco Felsch]

Hi Laurent,

On 21-04-30 01:14, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > On 21-04-29 04:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > Add special 8/12bit bayer media bus format for the OnSemi AR0237IR
> > > > camera sensor [1]. OnSemi calls this format RGB-IR, the pixel array
> > > > with the interleaved IR pixels looks like:
> > > > 
> > > >         |  G |  R |  G |  B | ...
> > > >         +----+----+----+----+---
> > > >         | IR |  G | IR |  G | ...
> > > >         +----+----+----+----+---
> > > >         |  G |  B |  G |  R | ...
> > > >         +----+----+----+----+---
> > > >         | IR |  G | IR |  G | ...
> > > >         +----+----+----+----+---
> > > >         | .. | .. | .. | .. | ..
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://www.framos.com/media/pdf/96/ac/8f/AR0237CS-D-PDF-framos.pdf
> > > 
> > > I think we're reaching a limit of the media bus codes model here, due to
> > > a historical mistake. The four possible Bayer patterns, times the
> > > different number of bits per pixel, creates a lot of media bus codes,
> > > and drivers for CSI-2 receivers and IP cores further down the pipeline
> > > have to support them all.
> > 
> > That's correct but it is not bayer related. Currently it is what it is,
> > if a new code is added it must be propagated through all the involved
> > subdevs. On the other hand I wouldn't say that it is better to support
> > new codes per default for all drivers. Since this would add a lot of
> > untested code paths.
> 
> It's not an issue limited to Bayer patterns, but they make the issue
> worse given the number of possible combinations (think about adding DPCM
> and ALAW compression on top of that...).

You're right and again this will apply to all mbus formats...

> > > This is already painful, and if we had a
> > > non-Bayer pattern such as this one,
> > 
> > That's not exactly true since it is a bayer pattern but instead of using
> > 4x4 it uses 8x8 and it as some special pixels.
> > 
> > > we'll open the door to an explosion
> > > of the number of media bus codes (imagine all the different possible
> > > arrangements of this pattern, for instance if you enable horizontal
> > > and/or vertical flipping on the sensor). All drivers would need to be
> > > updated to support these new bus codes, and this really kills the
> > > current model.
> > 
> > Yep, I know what you mean but as I said above I think that adding it
> > explicite is the better abbroach since it involves somone who add _and_
> > test the new code on the particular platform.
> > 
> > > The historical mistake was to tie the Bayer pattern with the media bus
> > > code. We should really have specified raw 8/10/12/14/16 media bus codes,
> > > and conveyed the pattern separately. Most IP cores in the pipeline don't
> > > need to care about the pattern at all, and those who do (that's mostly
> > > ISPs) could be programmed explicitly by userspace as long as we have an
> > > API to retrieve the pattern from the sensor. I believe it's time to bite
> > > the bullet and go in that direction. I'm sorry for this case of yak
> > > shaving, but it really wouldn't be manageable anymore :-(
> > 
> > I got all your points and would agree but this is not a bayer only
> > related problem. You will have this problem with all new other formats
> > as well. I'm with you, most IP cores don't care but I wouldn't
> > guarantee that.
> 
> Sorry, but adding new media bus formats like this one will just not
> scale. We have two options, either fixing the issue, or considering that
> V4L2 is a barely alive API with no future, and merging this without
> caring anymore.

Hm.. you're right that it doesn't scale, as I said I'm absolute on your
side. So let us consider a new approach @Mauro, @Hans, @Sailus what do
you think about?

BTW: IMHO videobuf2 interface isn't that good as well, since you are
blaming ;)

Regards,
  Marco

> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |