[PATCH v3 10/11] dt-bindings: clock: stm32mp1 new compatible for secure rcc

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Tue Apr 20 19:30:20 BST 2021


On 4/19/21 11:38 AM, gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com>
> 
> Introduce new compatible string "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure" for
> stm32mp1 clock driver when the device is configured with RCC
> security support hardened.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere at foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com>
> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml          | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
> index 4e385508f516..8b1ecb2ecdd5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.yaml
> @@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ properties:
>   
>     compatible:
>       items:
> -      - const: st,stm32mp1-rcc
> +      - enum:
> +          - st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure
> +          - st,stm32mp1-rcc

It is still the same IP and same SoC silicon, so shouldn't the 
configuration be discerned via DT property instead of compatible string ?



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list