[PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: remove set but not used 'addr_cena'

Li Yang leoyang.li at nxp.com
Tue Sep 22 18:44:23 EDT 2020


On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 3:20 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 16:57, Jason Yan <yanaijie at huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > This addresses the following gcc warning with "make W=1":
> >
> > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c: In function
> > ‘qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct’:
> > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c:650:11: warning: variable
> > ‘addr_cena’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >   650 |  uint64_t addr_cena;
> >       |           ^~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci at huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie at huawei.com>
>
> This was already reported:
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/12/290
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>

Applied for next.  Thanks.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> > index 0ab85bfb116f..659b4a570d5b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> > @@ -647,7 +647,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
> >         const uint32_t *cl = (uint32_t *)d;
> >         uint32_t eqcr_ci, eqcr_pi, half_mask, full_mask;
> >         int i, num_enqueued = 0;
> > -       uint64_t addr_cena;
> >
> >         spin_lock(&s->access_spinlock);
> >         half_mask = (s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask>>1);
> > @@ -701,7 +700,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
> >
> >         /* Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */
> >         eqcr_pi = s->eqcr.pi;
> > -       addr_cena = (size_t)s->addr_cena;
> >         for (i = 0; i < num_enqueued; i++)
> >                 eqcr_pi++;
> >         s->eqcr.pi = eqcr_pi & full_mask;
> > --
> > 2.25.4
> >



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list