[PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for J7200 SoC

[Nishanth Menon]

On 21:47-20200910, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 9/10/20 1:20 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 12:54-20200910, Suman Anna wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> >>>> +		};
> >>>
> >>> I think we could introduce base infrastructure stuff like intr and
> >>> inta nodes here? Also, the gpio_intr?
> >>
> >> FYI, they are currently being added in Patch 1 from Grygorii's "[v2,0/4] arm64:
> >> dts: ti: k3-j7200: add dma and mcu cpsw" series,
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11763711/
> >>
> >> The overall series seems to have some dependencies, so better to separate out
> >> those nodes and include as an additional add-on patch to this series, atleast it
> >> can unblock all others who use the TI-SCI Interrupt node.
> >>
> > 
> > There is dependency on udma which in turn needs chipid stuff merged,
> > but I dont see anything preventing inta intr (which are infrastructure
> > components) from being merged in. It is not just udma driver that uses these
> > infrastructure.
> 
> Yep, I also meant the same.

ok. Please squash the ia/intr in to this patch as well.

> 
> > 
> > [...]
> >>>> +
> >>>> +/ {
> >>>> +	model = "Texas Instruments K3 J7200 SoC";
> >>>> +	compatible = "ti,j7200";
> >>>> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
> >>>> +	#address-cells = <2>;
> >>>> +	#size-cells = <2>;
[...]
> >>>> +		serial11 = &main_uart9;
> >>>> +	};
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> might be nice to leave a chosen { }; here to indicate board
> >>> files fill it up.. just to maintain consistency with rest of SoC dtsis?
> >>
> >> Doesn't serve any purpose IMO. I remember commenting about that blank node to
> >> remove it during some earlier reviews.
> > 
[...]
> 
> Yeah ok to add back then.


Lets squash the change to this patch.

Looking forward to the v4.
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D