[PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Tue Sep 8 06:27:52 EDT 2020
On 08-09-20, 15:35, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan at mediatek.com>
>
> Add MT6779 cpufreq HW support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan at mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 ++
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 294 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 307 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> index c6cbfc8..8e58c12 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -121,6 +121,18 @@ config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ
> help
> This adds the CPUFreq driver support for MediaTek SoCs.
>
> +config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW
> + tristate "MediaTek CPUFreq HW driver"
> + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> + default m
> + help
> + Support for the CPUFreq HW driver.
> + Some MediaTek chipsets have a HW engine to offload the steps
> + necessary for changing the frequency of the CPUs. Firmware loaded
> + in this engine exposes a programming interface to the OS.
> + The driver implements the cpufreq interface for this HW engine.
> + Say Y if you want to support CPUFreq HW.
> +
> config ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ
> bool "TI OMAP2+"
> depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> index f6670c4..dc1f371 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT) += imx-cpufreq-dt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_KIRKWOOD_CPUFREQ) += kirkwood-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ) += mediatek-cpufreq.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW) += mediatek-cpufreq-hw.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MVEBU_V7) += mvebu-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ) += omap-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ) += pxa2xx-cpufreq.o
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..61040b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 32U
> +#define LUT_FREQ GENMASK(11, 0)
> +#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 0x4
> +
> +enum {
> + REG_LUT_TABLE,
> + REG_ENABLE,
> + REG_PERF_STATE,
> +
> + REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
> +};
> +
> +struct cpufreq_mtk {
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
> + void __iomem *reg_bases[REG_ARRAY_SIZE];
> + cpumask_t related_cpus;
> +};
> +
> +static const u16 cpufreq_mtk_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
> + [REG_LUT_TABLE] = 0x0,
> + [REG_ENABLE] = 0x84,
> + [REG_PERF_STATE] = 0x88,
> +};
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_mtk *mtk_freq_domain_map[NR_CPUS];
> +
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int index)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
> +
> + writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_PERF_STATE]);
> + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus,
> + policy->freq_table[index].frequency,
> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> + unsigned int index;
> +
> + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
> + if (!policy)
> + return 0;
> +
> + c = policy->driver_data;
> +
> + index = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_PERF_STATE]);
> + index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
> +
> + return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
> + struct device *cpu_dev;
> +
> + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
> + if (!cpu_dev) {
> + pr_err("%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n", __func__,
> + policy->cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
> + if (!c) {
> + pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &c->related_cpus);
> +
> + policy->freq_table = c->table;
> + policy->driver_data = c;
> +
> + /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed now */
> + writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_ENABLE]);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct freq_attr *mtk_cpufreq_hw_attr[] = {
> + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver = {
> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
> + CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY,
> + .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> + .target_index = mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index,
> + .get = mtk_cpufreq_hw_get,
> + .init = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init,
> + .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
> + .attr = mtk_cpufreq_hw_attr,
You can use cpufreq_generic_attr instead.
> +};
> +
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_opp_create(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + void __iomem *base_table;
> + u32 data, i, freq, prev_freq = 0;
> +
> + c->table = devm_kcalloc(dev, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1,
> + sizeof(*c->table), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!c->table)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + base_table = c->reg_bases[REG_LUT_TABLE];
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
> + data = readl_relaxed(base_table + (i * LUT_ROW_SIZE));
> + freq = FIELD_GET(LUT_FREQ, data) * 1000;
> +
> + if (freq == prev_freq)
> + break;
> +
> + c->table[i].frequency = freq;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "index=%d freq=%d\n",
> + i, c->table[i].frequency);
> +
> + prev_freq = freq;
> + }
> +
> + c->table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpumask *m)
> +{
> + struct device_node *cpu_np;
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + if (!cpu_np)
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "mtk-freq-domain",
> + "#freq-domain-cells", 0,
> + &args);
> + of_node_put(cpu_np);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (index == args.args[0])
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, m);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_cpu_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + unsigned int cpu, int index)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + const u16 *offsets;
> + int ret, i, cpu_r;
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + if (mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu])
> + return 0;
> +
> + c = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!c)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + offsets = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!offsets)
> + return -EINVAL;
Just do this once in probe and pass it to this routine. You don't need
to do this again and again.
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, index);
> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(base))
> + return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> + for (i = REG_LUT_TABLE; i < REG_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
> + c->reg_bases[i] = base + offsets[i];
> +
> + ret = mtk_get_related_cpus(index, &c->related_cpus);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = mtk_cpufreq_hw_opp_create(pdev, c);
This isn't creating an OPP table anymore but just a frequency table.
Name it mtk_cpu_create_freq_table() rather.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to create OPP\n", index);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_cpu(cpu_r, &c->related_cpus)
> + mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu_r] = c;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *cpu_np;
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
> + unsigned int cpu;
> + int ret;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + if (!cpu_np) {
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get cpu %d device\n",
> + cpu);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "mtk-freq-domain",
> + "#freq-domain-cells", 0, &args);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = mtk_cpu_resources_init(pdev, cpu, args.args[0]);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Get the bases of cpufreq for domains */
> + ret = mtk_resources_init(pdev);
Just open-code this here. No need of a separate routine really, there
is not much there.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq resource init failed\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Mediatek CPUFreq HW driver initialized\n");
Just drop this, this isn't really required. The cpufreq core also
print some messages for this.
> + of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
Why do you need to do this ? This should happen automatically.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw", .data = &cpufreq_mtk_offsets },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver = {
> + .probe = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
> + .of_match_table = mtk_cpufreq_hw_match,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init mtk_cpufreq_hw_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(mtk_cpufreq_hw_init);
subsys_init ? Why this ?
You made your driver as a "tristate" driver, and you don't have any
exit/remove level stuff ?
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("mtk CPUFREQ HW Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 1.7.9.5
--
viresh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list