[PATCH v3 07/21] KVM: arm64: Convert kvm_phys_addr_ioremap() to generic page-table API

Will Deacon will at kernel.org
Wed Sep 2 07:48:41 EDT 2020


On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 06:08:01PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> On 8/25/20 10:39 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Convert kvm_phys_addr_ioremap() to use kvm_pgtable_stage2_map() instead
> > of stage2_set_pte().
> >
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> > Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 14 +-------------
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c         | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > index 41ee8f3c0369..6f65d3841ec9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > @@ -439,18 +439,6 @@ struct stage2_map_data {
> >  	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache	*memcache;
> >  };
> >  
> > -static kvm_pte_t *stage2_memcache_alloc_page(struct stage2_map_data *data)
> > -{
> > -	kvm_pte_t *ptep = NULL;
> > -	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc = data->memcache;
> > -
> > -	/* Allocated with GFP_PGTABLE_USER, so no need to zero */
> > -	if (mc && mc->nobjs)
> > -		ptep = mc->objects[--mc->nobjs];
> > -
> > -	return ptep;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int stage2_map_set_prot_attr(enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot,
> >  				    struct stage2_map_data *data)
> >  {
> > @@ -531,7 +519,7 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> >  	if (WARN_ON(level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -	childp = stage2_memcache_alloc_page(data);
> > +	childp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(data->memcache);
> 
> I think this hunk and the above could have been squashed in the previous patch, I
> think we could have used kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc directly from the start.

Urgh, looks like I squashed into the wrong patch when I rebased this before.
Thanks, I'll fix that (but damn, rebasing this series sucks rocks).

Will



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list