[PATCH RFC 5/8] kasan: mark kasan_init_tags as __init

Marco Elver elver at google.com
Thu Oct 15 06:23:12 EDT 2020


On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 22:44, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl at google.com> wrote:
>
> Similarly to kasan_init() mark kasan_init_tags() as __init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl at google.com>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I8792e22f1ca5a703c5e979969147968a99312558
> ---
>  include/linux/kasan.h | 4 ++--
>  mm/kasan/hw_tags.c    | 2 +-
>  mm/kasan/sw_tags.c    | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
> index 7be9fb9146ac..af8317b416a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kasan.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static inline void kasan_record_aux_stack(void *ptr) {}
>
>  #if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)
>
> -void kasan_init_tags(void);
> +void __init kasan_init_tags(void);
>
>  void *kasan_reset_tag(const void *addr);
>
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ bool kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size,
>
>  #else /* CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS || CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */
>
> -static inline void kasan_init_tags(void) { }
> +static inline void __init kasan_init_tags(void) { }

Should we mark empty static inline functions __init? __init comes with
a bunch of other attributes, but hopefully they don't interfere with
inlining?

>  static inline void *kasan_reset_tag(const void *addr)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c b/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c
> index 2a38885014e3..0128062320d5 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>
>  #include "kasan.h"
>
> -void kasan_init_tags(void)
> +void __init kasan_init_tags(void)
>  {
>         init_tags(KASAN_TAG_MAX);
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c b/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c
> index c10863a45775..bf1422282bb5 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/sw_tags.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, prng_state);
>
> -void kasan_init_tags(void)
> +void __init kasan_init_tags(void)
>  {
>         int cpu;
>
> --
> 2.28.0.1011.ga647a8990f-goog
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list