[PATCH] firmware: imx: always export scu symbols

Liu Ying victor.liu at nxp.com
Wed Oct 14 21:33:10 EDT 2020


Hi Joakim,

On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 16:57 +0800, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> From: Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com>
> 
> Always export scu symbols for both SCU SoCs and non-SCU SoCs to avoid
> build error.

s/scu/SCU/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang at nxp.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h      | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/firmware/imx/svc/misc.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h
> b/include/linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h
> index 891057434858..300fa253fc30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct imx_sc_rpc_msg {
>  	uint8_t func;
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_SCU)
>  /*
>   * This is an function to send an RPC message over an IPC channel.
>   * It is called by client-side SCFW API function shims.
> @@ -55,4 +56,18 @@ int imx_scu_call_rpc(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, void
> *msg, bool have_resp);
>   * @return Returns an error code (0 = success, failed if < 0)
>   */
>  int imx_scu_get_handle(struct imx_sc_ipc **ipc);
> +
> +#else
> +static inline int
> +imx_scu_call_rpc(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, void *msg, bool have_resp)
> +{
> +	return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int imx_scu_get_handle(struct imx_sc_ipc **ipc)
> +{
> +	return -EIO;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _SC_IPC_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/imx/svc/misc.h
> b/include/linux/firmware/imx/svc/misc.h
> index 031dd4d3c766..d255048f17de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/imx/svc/misc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/imx/svc/misc.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ enum imx_misc_func {
>   * Control Functions
>   */
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_SCU)
>  int imx_sc_misc_set_control(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, u32 resource,
>  			    u8 ctrl, u32 val);
>  
> @@ -55,4 +56,26 @@ int imx_sc_misc_get_control(struct imx_sc_ipc
> *ipc, u32 resource,
>  int imx_sc_pm_cpu_start(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, u32 resource,
>  			bool enable, u64 phys_addr);
>  
> +#else
> +static inline int
> +imx_sc_misc_set_control(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, u32 resource,
> +			u8 ctrl, u32 val)
> +{
> +	return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +imx_sc_misc_get_control(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, u32 resource,
> +			u8 ctrl, u32 *val)
> +{
> +	return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int imx_sc_pm_cpu_start(struct imx_sc_ipc *ipc, u32
> resource,
> +				      bool enable, u64 phys_addr)
> +{
> +	return -EIO;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _SC_MISC_API_H */

This is done in our downstream tree. I did this because a downstream
display driver covers SoCs w/wo SCU. For upstream, I find the drivers
can be splited so that this is not needed.

Do you see any existing upstream driver covers SoCs w/wo SCU?
I think this can be introduced together with the first that kink of
driver.

-- 
 Liu Ying




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list