[PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for soc unique ID

Rob Herring robh+dt at kernel.org
Fri Dec 18 08:59:31 EST 2020


On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:14 AM Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo at oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> > Sent: 2020年12月18日 17:37
> > To: Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo at oss.nxp.com>
> > Cc: robh+dt at kernel.org; shawnguo at kernel.org; s.hauer at pengutronix.de;
> > kernel at pengutronix.de; festevam at gmail.com; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx
> > <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: imx8m: add DT Binding doc for soc
> > unique ID
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:05:00AM +0000, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
> >  > > +    required:
> > > > > +      - compatible
> > > > > +      - nvmem-cells
> > > > > +      - nvmem-cell-names
> > > > > +
> > > > > +additionalProperties: true
> > > >
> > > > Don't leave comments unresolved (or resolve them against review
> > > > without discussion). Rob asked for changing it. The same as with all
> > > > schemas - you need to describe the missing properties.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Krzysztof
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Thank you for your advice. I replied to him and let him know I remained here
> > unchanged. There will be errors according to his suggestion.
> >
> > Then the solution is to correct the errors - describe missing properties
> > - instead of ignoring the suggestion and making a resubmit right away.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
>
> Hi,
> I am sorry I do not DT Binding doc very well.
>
> I checked the usage of patternProperties and additionalProperties in https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/object.html.
> I noticed a sentence on the website: " If additionalProperties is a boolean and set to false, no additional properties will be allowed.", so I think that
> if additionalProperties is a boolean and set to true, additional properties will be allowed. Letting here unchanged is my solution to correct the errors.
> I am not sure, I asked Rob for advice on the v6 by email, but he didn't reply to me, so I made a resubmit.

You waited an hour and I was sleeping! Waiting means waiting a week.

You need to add '#address-cells' and '#size-cells'.

Rob



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list