[PATCH v24 4/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add documentation for ZynqMP R5 rproc bindings
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Mon Dec 7 13:04:10 EST 2020
Rob Herring is the maintainer of all the yaml files - he is the one this patch
needs to go to. I merely look at them to understand the platform device
implementation.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:57:16AM -0800, Ben Levinsky wrote:
> Add binding for ZynqMP R5 OpenAMP.
>
> Represent the RPU domain resources in one device node. Each RPU
> processor is a subnode of the top RPU domain node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wu <j.wu at xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <jliang at xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky at xilinx.com>
> ---
> v24: update for 'make dt_binding_check' errors
> ---
> .../xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml | 223 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 223 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bccbdee8c3f2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml#"
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
> +
> +title: Xilinx R5 remote processor controller bindings
> +
> +description:
> + This document defines the binding for the remoteproc component that loads and
> + boots firmwares on the Xilinx Zynqmp and Versal family chipsets.
> +
> + Note that the Linux has global addressing view of the R5-related memory (TCM)
> + so the absolute address ranges are provided in TCM reg's.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Ed Mooring <ed.mooring at xilinx.com>
> + - Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky at xilinx.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + $nodename:
> + pattern: "^r5fss(@.*)?"
> +
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: Address and Size of Xilinx RPU Configuration register
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + ranges: true
> +
> +# Optional properties:
> +# --------------------
> + xlnx,cluster-mode:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + enum: [0, 1]
> + description: |
> + Configuration Mode for the Dual R5F cores within the R5F cluster.
> + Should be either a value of 1 (LockStep mode) or 0 (Split mode),
> + default is LockStep mode if omitted.
> +
> +
> +#R5F Processor Child Nodes:
> +# ==========================
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^r5f_[a-f0-9]+$":
> + type: object
> + description: |
> + The R5F Sub-System device node should define one or two R5F child nodes,
> + each node representing a Xilinx instantiation of the Arm Cortex R5F core.
> + There should be one or two child nodes if the R5F is in Split mode and
> + one child node if the R5F is in Lockstep mode.
> +
> + In Split mode each R5F core has two associated TCM Banks. R5_0 has
> + TCM Banks 0A and 0B and R5_1 has TCM Banks 1A and 1B.
> +
> + In Lockstep mode only one R5F child node should be defined. This one
> + child has access to TCM Banks 0A, 0B, 1A and 1B and any of the four can
> + be included in the child R5F's sram property.
> +
> + The example below shows Split mode with two child nodes.
> +
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - xilinx,r5f
> +
> +# The following properties are mandatory for R5F Core0 in both LockStep and Split
> +# modes, and are mandatory for R5F Core1 _only_ in Split mode.
> +
> + memory-region:
> + description: |
> + Phandles to the memory nodes to be associated with the
Is a word missing here?
> + The reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and
> + should be defined with a "no-map" property as per the bindings in
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 6
> + items:
> + - description: Region used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and
> + vring buffers
> + - description: region reserved for firmware image sections
> + additionalItems: true
> +
> + power-domain:
> + description: |
> + Power node ID that is used to uniquely identify the RPU for Xilinx
> + Power Management.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +# Optional properties:
> +# --------------------
> +# The following properties are optional properties for each of the R5F cores:
> +
> + mboxes:
> + description: |
> + Standard property to specify a mailbox
> + This property is required only if the rpmsg/virtio functionality
> + is used
> +
> + Refer to the zynqmp-ipi-mailbox documentation for client usage of this
> + property
Indentation problem
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + mbox-names:
> + description: |
> + Refer to the zynqmp-ipi-mailbox documentation for client usage of this
> + property
> + items:
> + - const: tx
> + - const: rx
> +
> + sram:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 4
> + description: |
> + Phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions
> + should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
> + should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> +
> + required:
> + - compatible
> + - power-domain
> +
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> + - reg
> + - compatible
> + - "#address-cells"
> + - "#size-cells"
> + - ranges
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + / {
> + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-zcu102-rev1.0", "xlnx,zynqmp-zcu102", "xlnx,zynqmp";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + model = "ZynqMP ZCU102 ";
> +
> + zynqmp_ipi1 {
> + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <0 33 4>;
> + xlnx,ipi-id = <5>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + ipi_mailbox_rpu0: mailbox at ff990600 {
> + reg = <0xff990600 0x20>,
> + <0xff990620 0x20>,
> + <0xff9900c0 0x20>,
> + <0xff9900e0 0x20>;
> + reg-names = "local_request_region",
> + "local_response_region",
> + "remote_request_region",
> + "remote_response_region";
> + #mbox-cells = <1>;
> + xlnx,ipi-id = <3>;
> + };
> + ipi_mailbox_rpu1: mailbox at ff990780 {
> + reg = <0xff990780 0x20>,
> + <0xff9907a0 0x20>,
> + <0xff9907c0 0x20>,
> + <0xff9905a0 0x20>;
> + reg-names = "local_request_region",
> + "local_response_region",
> + "remote_request_region",
> + "remote_response_region";
> + #mbox-cells = <1>;
> + xlnx,ipi-id = <3>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + r5fss at ff9a0000 {
> + compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> + reg = <0x0 0xff9a0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> + xlnx,cluster-mode = <0>;
> +
> + r5f_0 {
> + compatible = "xilinx,r5f";
> + memory-region = <&elf_load0>,
> + <&rpu0vdev0vring0>,
> + <&rpu0vdev0vring1>,
> + <&rpu0vdev0buffer>;
> + sram = <&tcm_0a>, <&tcm_0b>;
> + mboxes = <&ipi_mailbox_rpu0 0x0 &ipi_mailbox_rpu0 0x1>;
> + mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> + power-domain = <0x7>;
> + };
> + r5f_1 {
> + compatible = "xilinx,r5f";
> + memory-region = <&elf_load1>,
> + <&rpu1vdev0vring0>,
> + <&rpu1vdev0vring1>,
> + <&rpu1vdev0buffer>;
> + sram = <&tcm_1a>, <&tcm_1b>;
> + mboxes = <&ipi_mailbox_rpu1 0x0 &ipi_mailbox_rpu1 0x1>;
> + mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> + power-domain = <0x8>;
> + };
> +
> + };
> + };
> +
> +...
> --
> 2.17.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list