[PATCH v4 1/5] arch_topology: validate input frequencies to arch_set_freq_scale()

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Mon Aug 31 07:13:08 EDT 2020


On 28-08-20, 18:32, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> The current frequency passed to arch_set_freq_scale() could end up
> being 0, signaling an error in setting a new frequency. Also, if the
> maximum frequency in 0, this will result in a division by 0 error.
> 
> Therefore, validate these input values before using them for the
> setting of the frequency scale factor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu at arm.com>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> ---
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 75f72d684294..5708eb724790 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,11 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq,
>  	unsigned long scale;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	if (unlikely(!cur_freq || !max_freq)) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +		return;
> +	}

This can be written as:

        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cur_freq || !max_freq))
                return;

With that.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>

> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If the use of counters for FIE is enabled, just return as we don't
>  	 * want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ.
> -- 
> 2.17.1

-- 
viresh



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list