[PATCH 14/14] arm64: Add ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support

Robin Murphy robin.murphy at arm.com
Fri Jan 26 07:50:55 PST 2018


On 26/01/18 14:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add the detection and runtime code for ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1.
> It is lovely. Really.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S        | 20 ++++++++++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
> index 76225c2611ea..add7e08a018d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>   
>   .macro ventry target
>   	.rept 31
> @@ -85,3 +86,22 @@ ENTRY(__qcom_hyp_sanitize_link_stack_start)
>   	.endr
>   	ldp	x29, x30, [sp], #16
>   ENTRY(__qcom_hyp_sanitize_link_stack_end)
> +
> +.macro smccc_workaround_1 inst
> +	sub	sp, sp, #(8 * 4)
> +	stp	x2, x3, [sp, #(16 * 0)]

This seems unnecessarily confusing - using either units of registers, or 
of register pairs, is fine, but mixing both in the same sequence just 
hurts more than it needs to.

> +	stp	x0, x1, [sp, #(16 * 1)]
> +	orr	w0, wzr, #ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1

Writing this as a MOV like a sane person would make things 0.37% more 
lovely, I promise ;)

> +	\inst	#0
> +	ldp	x2, x3, [sp, #(16 * 0)]
> +	ldp	x0, x1, [sp, #(16 * 1)]
> +	add	sp, sp, #(8 * 4)
> +.endm
> +
> +ENTRY(__smccc_workaround_1_smc_start)
> +	smccc_workaround_1	smc
> +ENTRY(__smccc_workaround_1_smc_end)
> +
> +ENTRY(__smccc_workaround_1_hvc_start)
> +	smccc_workaround_1	hvc
> +ENTRY(__smccc_workaround_1_hvc_end)

That said, should we not be implementing this lot in smccc-call.S...

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index ed6881882231..f1501873f2e4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct bp_hardening_data, bp_hardening_data);
>   extern char __psci_hyp_bp_inval_start[], __psci_hyp_bp_inval_end[];
>   extern char __qcom_hyp_sanitize_link_stack_start[];
>   extern char __qcom_hyp_sanitize_link_stack_end[];
> +extern char __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start[];
> +extern char __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end[];
> +extern char __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_start[];
> +extern char __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_end[];
>   
>   static void __copy_hyp_vect_bpi(int slot, const char *hyp_vecs_start,
>   				const char *hyp_vecs_end)
> @@ -116,6 +120,10 @@ static void __install_bp_hardening_cb(bp_hardening_cb_t fn,
>   #define __psci_hyp_bp_inval_end			NULL
>   #define __qcom_hyp_sanitize_link_stack_start	NULL
>   #define __qcom_hyp_sanitize_link_stack_end	NULL
> +#define __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start		NULL
> +#define __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end		NULL
> +#define __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_start		NULL
> +#define __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_end		NULL
>   
>   static void __install_bp_hardening_cb(bp_hardening_cb_t fn,
>   				      const char *hyp_vecs_start,
> @@ -142,17 +150,78 @@ static void  install_bp_hardening_cb(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
>   	__install_bp_hardening_cb(fn, hyp_vecs_start, hyp_vecs_end);
>   }
>   
> +#include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>   #include <linux/psci.h>
>   
> +static void call_smc_arch_workaround_1(void)
> +{
> +	register int w0 asm("w0") = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1;
> +	asm volatile("smc	#0\n"
> +		     : "+r" (w0));
> +}
> +
> +static void call_hvc_arch_workaround_1(void)
> +{
> +	register int w0 asm("w0") = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1;
> +	asm volatile("hvc	#0\n"
> +		     : "+r" (w0));
> +}

...such that these could simply be something like:

static void call_{smc,hvc}_arch_workaround_1(void)
{
	arm_smccc_v1_1_{smc,hvc}(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1);
}

?

Robin.

> +
> +static bool check_smccc_arch_workaround_1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
> +{
> +	bp_hardening_cb_t cb;
> +	void *smccc_start, *smccc_end;
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> +	if (psci_ops.variant == SMCCC_VARIANT_1_0)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	switch (psci_ops.conduit) {
> +	case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC:
> +		arm_smccc_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
> +			      ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> +			      &res);
> +		if (res.a0)
> +			return false;
> +		cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
> +		smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_start;
> +		smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_end;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC:
> +		arm_smccc_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
> +			      ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> +			      &res);
> +		if (res.a0)
> +			return false;
> +		cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
> +		smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
> +		smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	install_bp_hardening_cb(entry, cb, smccc_start, smccc_end);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>   static int enable_psci_bp_hardening(void *data)
>   {
>   	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry = data;
>   
> -	if (psci_ops.get_version)
> +	if (psci_ops.get_version) {
> +		if (check_smccc_arch_workaround_1(entry))
> +			return 0;
> +
>   		install_bp_hardening_cb(entry,
>   				       (bp_hardening_cb_t)psci_ops.get_version,
>   				       __psci_hyp_bp_inval_start,
>   				       __psci_hyp_bp_inval_end);
> +	}
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list