[PATCH v6 08/10] pwm: pwm-omap-dmtimer: Adapt driver to utilize dmtimer pdata ops

Keerthy j-keerthy at ti.com
Mon Jan 8 08:24:42 PST 2018



On 1/8/2018 8:17 PM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08.01.2018 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 08/01/2018 15:33, Keerthy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday 08 January 2018 02:14 PM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02.01.2018 12:09, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>> Adapt driver to utilize dmtimer pdata ops instead of pdata-quirks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy at ti.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis at linux-mips.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
>>>>> index 5ad42f3..3b27aff 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c
>>>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>>>   #include <linux/mutex.h>
>>>>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>>>>   #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/platform_data/dmtimer-omap.h>
>>>>>   #include <linux/platform_data/pwm_omap_dmtimer.h>
>>>>>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>>>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>>> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip {
>>>>>   	struct pwm_chip chip;
>>>>>   	struct mutex mutex;
>>>>>   	pwm_omap_dmtimer *dm_timer;
>>>>> -	struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_pdata *pdata;
>>>>> +	struct omap_dm_timer_ops *pdata;
>>>>>   	struct platform_device *dm_timer_pdev;
>>>>>   };
>>>>>   
>>>>> @@ -242,19 +243,33 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>   {
>>>>>   	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>>>>   	struct device_node *timer;
>>>>> +	struct platform_device *timer_pdev;
>>>>>   	struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip *omap;
>>>>> -	struct pwm_omap_dmtimer_pdata *pdata;
>>>>> +	struct dmtimer_platform_data *timer_pdata;
>>>>> +	struct omap_dm_timer_ops *pdata;
>>>>>   	pwm_omap_dmtimer *dm_timer;
>>>>>   	u32 v;
>>>>>   	int status;
>>>>>   
>>>>> -	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>>>>> -	if (!pdata) {
>>>>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing dmtimer platform data\n");
>>>>> +	timer = of_parse_phandle(np, "ti,timers", 0);
>>>> of_node_put() should be called when done with device_node pointer returned
>>>> by of_parse_phandle() (you may want to check the return ERROR cases below
>>>> regarding this statement):
>>>>> +	if (!timer)
>>>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	timer_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(timer);
>>>>> +	if (!timer_pdev) {
>>>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to find Timer pdev\n");
>>>> here
>>>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	timer_pdata = dev_get_platdata(&timer_pdev->dev);
>>>>> +	if (!timer_pdata) {
>>>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dmtimer pdata structure NULL\n");
>>>> here
>>>>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>>>>   	}
>>>>>   
>>>>> -	if (!pdata->request_by_node ||
>>>>> +	pdata = timer_pdata->timer_ops;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	if (!pdata || !pdata->request_by_node ||
>>>>>   	    !pdata->free ||
>>>>>   	    !pdata->enable ||
>>>>>   	    !pdata->disable ||
>>>>> @@ -270,10 +285,6 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>>>>   	}
>>>>>   
>>>>> -	timer = of_parse_phandle(np, "ti,timers", 0);
>>>>> -	if (!timer)
>>>>> -		return -ENODEV;
>>>>> -
>>>>>   	if (!of_get_property(timer, "ti,timer-pwm", NULL)) {
>>>> here
>>>>>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing ti,timer-pwm capability\n");
>>>>>   		return -ENODEV;
>>>>> @@ -291,13 +302,7 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>   
>>>>>   	omap->pdata = pdata;
>>>>>   	omap->dm_timer = dm_timer;
>>>>> -
>>>>> -	omap->dm_timer_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(timer);
>>>>> -	if (!omap->dm_timer_pdev) {
>>>>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to find timer pdev\n");
>>>>> -		omap->pdata->free(dm_timer);
>>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>>> -	}
>>>>> +	omap->dm_timer_pdev = timer_pdev;
>>>>>   
>>>>>   	/*
>>>>>   	 * Ensure that the timer is stopped before we allow PWM core to call
>>>>>
>>>> And all the other return instructions from probe function not listed by git diff
>>>
>>> Thanks for reviewing. I will add the of_node_put call for all the error
>>> paths.
> After that you can add: Reviwed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at microchip.com>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
>> Apart the missing of_node_put() :
>>
>> Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>

Thanks Neil and Claudiu.

>>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list