[PATCH v4 24/40] KVM: arm64: Rewrite system register accessors to read/write functions
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Thu Feb 22 02:48:10 PST 2018
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:22:37 +0000,
Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:32:45PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:03:16 +0000,
> > Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Christoffer Dall <cdall at cs.columbia.edu>
> > >
> > > Currently we access the system registers array via the vcpu_sys_reg()
> > > macro. However, we are about to change the behavior to some times
> > > modify the register file directly, so let's change this to two
> > > primitives:
> > >
> > > * Accessor macros vcpu_write_sys_reg() and vcpu_read_sys_reg()
> > > * Direct array access macro __vcpu_sys_reg()
> > >
> > > The first primitive should be used in places where the code needs to
> > > access the currently loaded VCPU's state as observed by the guest. For
> > > example, when trapping on cache related registers, a write to a system
> > > register should go directly to the VCPU version of the register.
> > >
> > > The second primitive can be used in places where the VCPU is known to
> > > never be running (for example userspace access) or for registers which
> > > are never context switched (for example all the PMU system registers).
> > >
> > > This rewrites all users of vcpu_sys_regs to one of the two primitives
> > > above.
> > >
> > > No functional change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall at cs.columbia.edu>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Notes:
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > - New patch (deferred register handling has been reworked)
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 13 ++++---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 13 ++++++-
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 2 +-
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 27 +++++++++-----
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c | 8 ++--
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 4 +-
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c | 4 +-
> > > virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 37 ++++++++++---------
> > > 9 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > > index 3cc535591bdf..d313aaae5c38 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > > @@ -290,15 +290,18 @@ static inline int kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >
> > > static inline unsigned long kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > - return vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> > > + return vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void kvm_vcpu_set_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > - if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> > > + if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> > > *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= COMPAT_PSR_E_BIT;
> > > - else
> > > - vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) |= (1 << 25);
> > > + } else {
> > > + u64 sctlr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1);
> > > + sctlr |= (1 << 25);
> > > + vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1, sctlr);
> >
> > General comment: it is slightly annoying that vcpu_write_sys_reg takes
> > its parameters in an order different from that of write_sysreg
> > (register followed with value, instead of value followed with
> > register). Not a deal breaker, but slightly confusing.
> >
>
> Ah, I didn't compare to write_sysreg, I was thinking that
>
> vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1);
> vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1, val);
>
> looked more symmetrical because the write just takes an extra value, but
> I can see your argument as well.
>
> I don't mind changing it if it matters to you?
I'd like to see that changed, but it doesn't have to be as part of
this series if it is going to cause a refactoring mess. We can address
it as a blanket fix after this series.
>
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline bool kvm_vcpu_is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > @@ -306,7 +309,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> > > return !!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & COMPAT_PSR_E_BIT);
> > >
> > > - return !!(vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) & (1 << 25));
> > > + return !!(vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) & (1 << 25));
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_guest_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > index f2a6f39aec87..68398bf7882f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > @@ -287,7 +287,18 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
> > > -#define vcpu_sys_reg(v,r) ((v)->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[(r)])
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Only use __vcpu_sys_reg if you know you want the memory backed version of a
> > > + * register, and not the one most recently accessed by a runnning VCPU. For
> > > + * example, for userpace access or for system registers that are never context
> > > + * switched, but only emulated.
> > > + */
> > > +#define __vcpu_sys_reg(v,r) ((v)->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[(r)])
> > > +
> > > +#define vcpu_read_sys_reg(v,r) __vcpu_sys_reg(v,r)
> > > +#define vcpu_write_sys_reg(v,r,n) do { __vcpu_sys_reg(v,r) = n; } while (0)
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * CP14 and CP15 live in the same array, as they are backed by the
> > > * same system registers.
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > > index 9679067a1574..95f46e73c4dc 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ struct kvm;
> > >
> > > static inline bool vcpu_has_cache_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > - return (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) & 0b101) == 0b101;
> > > + return (vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) & 0b101) == 0b101;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline void __clean_dcache_guest_page(kvm_pfn_t pfn, unsigned long size)
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> > > index feedb877cff8..db32d10a56a1 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> > > @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, mdcr_el2);
> > > */
> > > static void save_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > - vcpu->arch.guest_debug_preserved.mdscr_el1 = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1);
> > > + vcpu->arch.guest_debug_preserved.mdscr_el1 =
> > > + vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1);
> > >
> > > trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("Saved MDSCR_EL1",
> > > vcpu->arch.guest_debug_preserved.mdscr_el1);
> > > @@ -54,10 +55,11 @@ static void save_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >
> > > static void restore_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > - vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1) = vcpu->arch.guest_debug_preserved.mdscr_el1;
> > > + vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1,
> > > + vcpu->arch.guest_debug_preserved.mdscr_el1);
> > >
> > > trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("Restored MDSCR_EL1",
> > > - vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1));
> > > + vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1));
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -108,6 +110,7 @@ void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > bool trap_debug = !(vcpu->arch.debug_flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY);
> > > + unsigned long mdscr;
> > >
> > > trace_kvm_arm_setup_debug(vcpu, vcpu->guest_debug);
> > >
> > > @@ -152,9 +155,13 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > */
> > > if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> > > *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= DBG_SPSR_SS;
> > > - vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1) |= DBG_MDSCR_SS;
> > > + mdscr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1);
> > > + mdscr |= DBG_MDSCR_SS;
> > > + vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1, mdscr);
> >
> > I have the feeling that we're going to need some clearbits/setbits
> > variants of vcpu_write_sysreg at some point.
> >
>
> I can introduce these now if you prefer?
Probably not yet. There is a number of places where we could do a
batter job at dealing with bitfields, the GICv3 cpuif emulation code
being a primary offender. If we start having these kind of primitives,
we can derive sysreg accessors from them in the long run.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list