[PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Wed Sep 13 15:11:23 PDT 2017


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:29:11AM -0700, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > > This patch implements the core logic for changing a task's vector
> > > length on request from userspace.  This will be used by the ptrace
> > > and prctl frontends that are implemented in later patches.
> > > 
> > > The SVE architecture permits, but does not require, implementations
> > > to support vector lengths that are not a power of two.  To handle
> > > this, logic is added to check a requested vector length against a
> > > possibly sparse bitmap of available vector lengths at runtime, so
> > > that the best supported value can be chosen.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin at arm.com>
> > > Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee at linaro.org>
> > 
> > Can this be merged with patch 20? It seems to add the PR_ definitions
> > which get actually used later when the prctl interface is added.
> 
> This patch is used both by patch 19 and by patch 20, which I preferred
> not to merge with each other: ptrace and prctl are significantly
> different things.
> 
> The prctl bit definitions are added here because they are the canonical
> definitions used by both interfaces.  The ptrace #defines are based on
> them.
> 
> Does it make sense if I merge patch 20 into this one and apply patch 19
> on top?  This avoide the appearance of prctl #defines with no prctl
> implementation.

That's fine, you can bring patch 20 forward. If there are other
non-trivial issues, feel free to ignore my comment.

-- 
Catalin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list