[RESEND PATCH 2/2] arm/arm64: pmu: Distinguish percpu irq and percpu_devid irq

[Mark Rutland]

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:26:45PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> arm_pmu interrupts are maked as PERCPU even when these are not local
> physical interrupts to a single CPU. When using non-local interrupts,
> interrupts marked as PERCPU will not get freed not disabled properly
> by the PMU driver.
> 
> Check if interrupts are local to a single CPU with PERCPU_DEVID since
> this is what the PMU driver really needs to know.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry at arm.com>
> Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

I guess these should have been with prefixed 'Cc: '.

The patch itself looks good to me:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

I suspect we'll need to take both patches via the usual arm pmu tree, so
it'd be good if we could get an ack on patch 1.

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c          | 10 +++++-----
>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index d14fc2e..7bc5eee 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
>  	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
>  		return;
> 
> -	if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> +	if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
>  		free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
>  		cpumask_clear(&armpmu->active_irqs);
>  		return;
> @@ -565,10 +565,10 @@ int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
>  	if (!irq)
>  		return 0;
> 
> -	if (irq_is_percpu(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
> +	if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
>  		err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
>  					 &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
> -	} else if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> +	} else if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
>  		int other_cpu = cpumask_first(&armpmu->active_irqs);
>  		int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, other_cpu);
> 
> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static int arm_perf_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> 
>  	irq = armpmu_get_cpu_irq(pmu, cpu);
>  	if (irq) {
> -		if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> +		if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
>  			enable_percpu_irq(irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int arm_perf_teardown_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	irq = armpmu_get_cpu_irq(pmu, cpu);
> -	if (irq && irq_is_percpu(irq))
> +	if (irq && irq_is_percpu_devid(irq))
>  		disable_percpu_irq(irq);
> 
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> index 4eafa7a..bbc64ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int pmu_parse_irqs(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> 
>  	if (num_irqs == 1) {
>  		int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -		if (irq && irq_is_percpu(irq))
> +		if (irq && irq_is_percpu_devid(irq))
>  			return pmu_parse_percpu_irq(pmu, irq);
>  	}
> 
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int pmu_parse_irqs(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
>  		if (WARN_ON(irq <= 0))
>  			continue;
> 
> -		if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
> +		if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
>  			pr_warn("multiple PPIs or mismatched SPI/PPI detected\n");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> --
> 1.9.1