[PATCH v2] ARM: imx: Enable cpuidle for i.MX6DL starting at 1.1

[Leonard Crestez]

Enable cpuidle support on i.MX6DL starting from IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1.

This also makes the code cleaner because 6q and 6dl actually have
different revision histories.

Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <ping.bai at nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez at nxp.com>
---

Changes since v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg610461.html
* Clarified comment but kept > instead of >= because that's what the
old code used. Would be OK to change with further feedback.

 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 45801b2..5707113 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -371,10 +371,13 @@ static struct platform_device imx6q_cpufreq_pdev = {
 static void __init imx6q_init_late(void)
 {
 	/*
-	 * WAIT mode is broken on TO 1.0 and 1.1, so there is no point
-	 * to run cpuidle on them.
+	 * WAIT mode is broken on imx6 Dual/Quad revision 1.0 and 1.1 so
+	 * there is no point to run cpuidle on them.
+	 *
+	 * It does work on imx6 Solo/DualLite starting from 1.1
 	 */
-	if (imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1)
+	if ((cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1) ||
+	    (cpu_is_imx6dl() && imx_get_soc_revision() > IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0))
 		imx6q_cpuidle_init();
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
-- 
2.7.4