[PATCH v4 08/10] arm64: kexec_file: set up for crash dump adding elf core header

Julien Thierry julien.thierry at arm.com
Thu Oct 5 07:15:52 PDT 2017



On 02/10/17 07:14, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> load_crashdump_segments() creates and loads a memory segment of elf core
> header for crash dump.
> 
> "linux,usable-memory-range" and "linux,elfcorehdr" will add to the 2nd
> kernel's device-tree blob. The logic of this cod is also from kexec-tools.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h         |   5 ++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/kexec_file.c                    |   2 +-
>   3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> index 2fadd3cbf3af..edb702e64a8a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ static inline void crash_post_resume(void) {}
>   
>   struct kimage_arch {
>   	void *dtb_buf;
> +	/* Core ELF header buffer */
> +	void *elf_headers;
> +	unsigned long elf_headers_sz;
> +	unsigned long elf_load_addr;
>   };
>   
>   struct kimage;
> @@ -113,6 +117,7 @@ extern int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image,
>   		unsigned long kernel_load_addr,
>   		char *initrd, unsigned long initrd_len,
>   		char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len);
> +extern int load_crashdump_segments(struct kimage *image);
>   #endif
>   
>   #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> index 8a09d89f6266..1d30b4773af5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
>   	vfree(image->arch.dtb_buf);
>   	image->arch.dtb_buf = NULL;
>   
> +	vfree(image->arch.elf_headers);
> +	image->arch.elf_headers = NULL;
> +	image->arch.elf_headers_sz = 0;
> +
>   	return _kexec_kernel_post_load_cleanup(image);
>   }
>   
> @@ -48,6 +52,77 @@ int arch_kexec_walk_mem(struct kexec_buf *kbuf, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
>   		return walk_system_ram_res(0, ULONG_MAX, kbuf, func);
>   }
>   
> +static int __init arch_kexec_file_init(void)
> +{
> +	/* Those values are used later on loading the kernel */
> +	__dt_root_addr_cells = dt_root_addr_cells;
> +	__dt_root_size_cells = dt_root_size_cells;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(arch_kexec_file_init);
> +
> +#define FDT_ALIGN(x, a)	(((x) + (a) - 1) & ~((a) - 1))
> +#define FDT_TAGALIGN(x)	(FDT_ALIGN((x), FDT_TAGSIZE))
> +
> +static int fdt_prop_len(const char *prop_name, int len)
> +{
> +	return (strlen(prop_name) + 1) +
> +		sizeof(struct fdt_property) +
> +		FDT_TAGALIGN(len);
> +}
> +
> +static bool cells_size_fitted(unsigned long base, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	/* if *_cells >= 2, cells can hold 64-bit values anyway */
> +	if ((__dt_root_addr_cells == 1) && (base >= (1ULL << 32)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if ((__dt_root_size_cells == 1) && (size >= (1ULL << 32)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void fill_property(void *buf, u64 val64, int cells)
> +{
> +	u32 val32;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (cells == 1) {
> +		val32 = cpu_to_fdt32((u32)val64);
> +		memcpy(buf, &val32, sizeof(val32));
> +	} else {
> +		for (i = 0; i < (cells * sizeof(u32) - sizeof(u64)); i++)
> +			*(char *)buf++ = 0;
> +

Should we use memset for this?

> +		val64 = cpu_to_fdt64(val64);
> +		memcpy(buf, &val64, sizeof(val64));
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int fdt_setprop_range(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, const char *name,
> +				unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	u64 range[2];

Could we just add some BUG/WARN when either __dt_root_addr_cells or 
__dt_root_size_cells is greater than 2?

Both to make sure we have sane values and because it will be easier to 
debug than overwriting things on the stack.

> +	void *prop;
> +	size_t buf_size;
> +	int result;
> +
> +	prop = range;
> +	buf_size = (__dt_root_addr_cells + __dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(u32);
> +
> +	fill_property(prop, addr, __dt_root_addr_cells);
> +	prop += __dt_root_addr_cells * sizeof(u32);
> +
> +	fill_property(prop, size, __dt_root_size_cells);
> +	prop += __dt_root_size_cells * sizeof(u32);

This is not needed (or at least we aren't doing anything with it).

Apart from that, patch seems fine.

Cheers,

> +
> +	result = fdt_setprop(fdt, nodeoffset, name, range, buf_size);
> +
> +	return result;
> +}
> +
>   int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
>   		unsigned long initrd_load_addr, unsigned long initrd_len,
>   		char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len,
> @@ -60,10 +135,26 @@ int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
>   	int range_len;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	/* check ranges against root's #address-cells and #size-cells */
> +	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH &&
> +		(!cells_size_fitted(image->arch.elf_load_addr,
> +				image->arch.elf_headers_sz) ||
> +		 !cells_size_fitted(crashk_res.start,
> +				crashk_res.end - crashk_res.start + 1))) {
> +		pr_err("Crash memory region doesn't fit into DT's root cell sizes.\n");
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* duplicate dt blob */
>   	buf_size = fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params);
>   	range_len = (__dt_root_addr_cells + __dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(u32);
>   
> +	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> +		buf_size += fdt_prop_len("linux,elfcorehdr", range_len)
> +				+ fdt_prop_len("linux,usable-memory-range",
> +								range_len);
> +
>   	if (initrd_load_addr)
>   		buf_size += fdt_prop_len("initrd-start", sizeof(u64))
>   				+ fdt_prop_len("initrd-end", sizeof(u64));
> @@ -85,6 +176,23 @@ int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
>   	if (nodeoffset < 0)
>   		goto out_err;
>   
> +	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> +		/* add linux,elfcorehdr */
> +		ret = fdt_setprop_range(buf, nodeoffset, "linux,elfcorehdr",
> +				image->arch.elf_load_addr,
> +				image->arch.elf_headers_sz);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_err;
> +
> +		/* add linux,usable-memory-range */
> +		ret = fdt_setprop_range(buf, nodeoffset,
> +				"linux,usable-memory-range",
> +				crashk_res.start,
> +				crashk_res.end - crashk_res.start + 1);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* add bootargs */
>   	if (cmdline) {
>   		ret = fdt_setprop(buf, nodeoffset, "bootargs",
> @@ -211,3 +319,44 @@ int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image, unsigned long kernel_load_addr,
>   	image->arch.dtb_buf = NULL;
>   	return ret;
>   }
> +
> +int load_crashdump_segments(struct kimage *image)
> +{
> +	void *elf_addr;
> +	unsigned long elf_sz;
> +	struct kexec_buf kbuf;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (image->type != KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Prepare elf headers and add a segment */
> +	ret = prepare_elf_headers(image, &elf_addr, &elf_sz);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("Preparing elf core header failed\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	kbuf.image = image;
> +	kbuf.buffer = elf_addr;
> +	kbuf.bufsz = elf_sz;
> +	kbuf.memsz = elf_sz;
> +	kbuf.buf_align = PAGE_SIZE;
> +	kbuf.buf_min = crashk_res.start;
> +	kbuf.buf_max = crashk_res.end + 1;
> +	kbuf.top_down = 1;
> +
> +	ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		vfree(elf_addr);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	image->arch.elf_headers = elf_addr;
> +	image->arch.elf_headers_sz = elf_sz;
> +	image->arch.elf_load_addr = kbuf.mem;
> +
> +	pr_debug("Loaded elf core header at 0x%lx bufsz=0x%lx memsz=0x%lx\n",
> +			 image->arch.elf_load_addr, elf_sz, elf_sz);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 8a7f029c5995..82a98f284cf5 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_elf_data *ced,
>   	phdr->p_filesz = phdr->p_memsz = VMCOREINFO_NOTE_SIZE;
>   	(ehdr->e_phnum)++;
>   
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
>   	/* Prepare PT_LOAD type program header for kernel text region */
>   	phdr = (Elf64_Phdr *)bufp;
>   	bufp += sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
> 

-- 
Julien Thierry



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list